Bug ability pontoneer.
The Pontoneer ability, would have Provides to 50% speed bonus to the whole stack when crossing rivers, but in fact, provide a 50% bonus when it crosses any type of land, not only rivers.
Pocus wrote:It cuts by half the day cost for major river, minor river, major ferry, minor ferry. What do you mean by 'any type' of land, that it speeds a stack by 50%, always?
Yes, always.
UID = 15
Name = $abi_nam_Pontoneer
Alias = Pontoneer
Kind = $abiMoveBonus
Text = $abi_txt_Pontoneer
ImageID = BR-indic_cross.png
Color = $colAbi_Green
Appliance = Group
Family = 0
Level = 1
Param0 = 50
ListParams0 = $MinorRiver|$MajorRiver|$MinorFerry|$MajorFerry
File ACW\GameData\abilities\15Pontoneer.abi, seems that this good, but if your you move to marine in clear land, only takes 2 days in crossing it.
With the new patch 1.10a, the problem continues.
The Pontoneer ability, would have Provides to 50% speed bonus to the whole stack when crossing rivers, but in fact, provide a 50% bonus when it crosses clear terrain.
Stacks that has the pontoneer ability, moves almost so fast by clear land as by railroad. This affects much to the balance of the game.
The Pontoneer ability, would have Provides to 50% speed bonus to the whole stack when crossing rivers, but in fact, provide a 50% bonus when it crosses clear terrain.
Stacks that has the pontoneer ability, moves almost so fast by clear land as by railroad. This affects much to the balance of the game.
-
Gray_Lensman
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
- Location: Who is John Galt?
-
mikee64
- Brigadier General
- Posts: 413
- Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 12:13 am
- Location: Virginia
- Contact: Website
I think I have confirmed this one. 2nd Reserve Bde moving alone from Richmond (woods) to Buckingham (clear), no river crossing. 4 days:
Attach a marine, travel time is 2 days:
This was just one simple test I used with units I already had in place. If more tests are needed let me know and I will do so.
BTW look carefully and you will see Athena had Richmond blockaded!
Attach a marine, travel time is 2 days:
This was just one simple test I used with units I already had in place. If more tests are needed let me know and I will do so.
BTW look carefully and you will see Athena had Richmond blockaded!
-
Gray_Lensman
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
- Location: Who is John Galt?
I checked Mike save. The problem has nothing to do with the ability, but more with the movement type of units involved.
Marines are labeled as heavy infantry in movement type. Others are with the 'line infantry' movement.
For movement, this will be the unit with heavy inf. which will be used. There is a movement hierarchy in the game engine to identify quickly what will be the unit used for movement cost purpose. The game engine don't compute for each unit in a stack the movement cost, taking the highest one, that would be far too slow.
So the marine unit is used, with heavy inf. movement, and the speed and cohesion of the marine. It seems that in this special case, the marine will be in the end faster than line inf in clear. I would suggest switching the marine unit to line infantry movement type and giving him a 105% or 110% move rate, to be more coherent. In such case, the program would take all units with line infantry movement type, and then will pick the slowest unit among them, so the marine (having a MR of 105%) will be excluded and another infantry will be taken. This should work.
Marines are labeled as heavy infantry in movement type. Others are with the 'line infantry' movement.
For movement, this will be the unit with heavy inf. which will be used. There is a movement hierarchy in the game engine to identify quickly what will be the unit used for movement cost purpose. The game engine don't compute for each unit in a stack the movement cost, taking the highest one, that would be far too slow.
So the marine unit is used, with heavy inf. movement, and the speed and cohesion of the marine. It seems that in this special case, the marine will be in the end faster than line inf in clear. I would suggest switching the marine unit to line infantry movement type and giving him a 105% or 110% move rate, to be more coherent. In such case, the program would take all units with line infantry movement type, and then will pick the slowest unit among them, so the marine (having a MR of 105%) will be excluded and another infantry will be taken. This should work.
Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."
-
Gray_Lensman
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
- Location: Who is John Galt?
-
Franciscus
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:31 pm
- Location: Portugal
-
Gray_Lensman
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
- Location: Who is John Galt?
I have noticed yesterday that moving a stack (3 20lb arts and one siege cannon) from Philadelphia to the square south west of Washington was taking 16 days (by rail).
Splitting them into a stack with the 3 20lb arts was taking 13 days, and sending the siege cannon alone and separatly was taking 14 days.
Any ideas why ? (I'm not sure I understood all explanations Pocus gave about the algorithm used to compute the moves costs).
Splitting them into a stack with the 3 20lb arts was taking 13 days, and sending the siege cannon alone and separatly was taking 14 days.
Any ideas why ? (I'm not sure I understood all explanations Pocus gave about the algorithm used to compute the moves costs).
"Dans chaque vieux, il y a un jeune qui se demande ce qui s'est passé" Terry Pratchett
-
Gray_Lensman
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
- Location: Who is John Galt?
-
Gray_Lensman
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
- Location: Who is John Galt?
-
Franciscus
- Posts: 4571
- Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2007 8:31 pm
- Location: Portugal
-
Gray_Lensman
- Posts: 497
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
- Location: Who is John Galt?
Return to “Help to improve AACW!”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests