User avatar
Jacek
Major
Posts: 224
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 2:20 pm
Location: Poznań, Poland

Different infantry brigades

Wed Jun 13, 2007 1:05 pm

In Reinforcements window you have an option to recruit infantry brigades of different strength i.e 67,76,134. I usually go with the smallest ones, so my question is does their different strength come only from the number of men in a brigade or do bigger brigades have embedded artillery, cav or more line troops?

Thx

User avatar
sval06
Captain
Posts: 191
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 7:46 pm

Wed Jun 13, 2007 1:19 pm

Second proposition.

You have the composition of the brigades on the lower side of the screen.
Some have 1 sharpshooters unit, some cavalry, some artillery or a mix....

User avatar
Doomwalker
Brigadier General
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 4:36 am
Location: Confederate held territory in Afghanistan.

Wed Jun 13, 2007 1:43 pm

I am of the opion that the higher rated units have heavy infantry or cavalry instead of regular infantry or cavalry. But, this of course is just an opion, based off of observation instead of real testing. I tend to build the higher rated units myself. I will try doing some high and low next time to see what I get and if I can verify, with proof, my observations.

User avatar
Jacek
Major
Posts: 224
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 2:20 pm
Location: Poznań, Poland

Wed Jun 13, 2007 1:53 pm

sval06, I have never paid attention to that line... Thanks!

User avatar
Doomwalker
Brigadier General
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 4:36 am
Location: Confederate held territory in Afghanistan.

Wed Jun 13, 2007 2:01 pm

Jacek, are you talking about the number only or the brigades that are composed of the same units but with different number values? For example under cavalry there are units rated 17 and also 22, but both are single cavalry units. Or where you just wondering about the composition of the units, based off of the numbers?

User avatar
Jacek
Major
Posts: 224
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 2:20 pm
Location: Poznań, Poland

Wed Jun 13, 2007 2:38 pm

I was thinking about composition. The cavalry units you mentioned - their different strength must be due to different number of men in them, right? Can't think of any other reason.

User avatar
Hinkel
Lieutenant
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 8:37 pm
Location: Germany
Contact: ICQ

Wed Jun 13, 2007 2:48 pm

Maybe some local regiments are just better? For example Texas Cav. is much better, cause the people in Texas can ride better then people in Florida. To ride on horse is tradition in Texas.

Thats my guess.. :)
[CENTER]The Grand Campaign project[/CENTER]
[font="Georgia"][CENTER]Commander-in-chief of the Confederate forces in the east[/CENTER][/font]
[CENTER]Image[/CENTER]

User avatar
Doomwalker
Brigadier General
Posts: 449
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 4:36 am
Location: Confederate held territory in Afghanistan.

Wed Jun 13, 2007 3:45 pm

That does make sense about the quantity of men in the units. I will check that also when I am checking about the composition, heavy vs regular.

User avatar
McNaughton
Posts: 2766
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:47 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Wed Jun 13, 2007 4:06 pm

There are different 'ranges' of units.

Constcript
Early
Late

Units start off as either conscript or early infantry, with conscript having lowered stats (slightly), but as a whole the unit is rated as lower (i.e., conscript cavalry having a combat powe of 17, while early cavalry has 22). There aren't more men, but, the unit has a greater fighting ability.

Brigades are done with a mix of conscript and early infantry (along with artillery, zouave, sharpshooters, etc.). A 106 value brigade may be full of 3 conscripts and attached cavalry and artillery, while a 64 value brigade may have 2 early infantry on their own.

Basically, it is up to the player as to what is useful for them. You may want a powerful brigade (there are a few 170 point Virginia brigades, which are a lot like a small division) for independent work, or a bunch of 'weaker' brigades, but are full of good quality troops (filling a division with 5 brigades of early troops is better than an equivalent number of elements in 3 brigades of conscript troops).

In the end, it really doesn't matter, unless you decide to go all mathematical and design the perfect division, which in my opinion eliminates some randomness and fun in the game.

Conhugeco
Corporal
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 4:44 pm
Location: Maryland

Wed Jun 13, 2007 6:07 pm

For the Union, some of those one element units can prove useful as garrisons for conquered cities.

Dick
In response to a critic: "General Lee surrendered to me. He did not surrender to any other Union General, although I believe there were several efforts made in that direction before I assumed command of the armies in Virginia." -- Ulysses Grant

User avatar
Montbrun
Major
Posts: 249
Joined: Sun May 06, 2007 9:27 pm
Location: Raleigh, NC

Wed Jun 13, 2007 7:07 pm

Cavalry should really be removed from the infantry brigade make-ups...

User avatar
Rafiki
Posts: 5811
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Oslo, Norway

Wed Jun 13, 2007 7:11 pm

I like having them there; gives more flexibility when you want to assemble larger formations.
[CENTER]Latest patches: AACW :: NCP :: WIA :: ROP :: RUS :: PON :: AJE
Visit AGEWiki - your increasingly comprehensive source for information about AGE games
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[/CENTER]

User avatar
Stonewall
Posts: 267
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: Florida, USA

Wed Jun 13, 2007 7:30 pm

Model strength (combat power) is a function of the number of "hits" the model possesses as well as its statistical ratings of the corredponding models combined with all other models comprising a particular unit.

User avatar
McNaughton
Posts: 2766
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 8:47 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

Wed Jun 13, 2007 7:50 pm

Montbrun wrote:Cavalry should really be removed from the infantry brigade make-ups...


I agree with this. Cavalry was only a part of infantry brigades in some limited initial engagements in 1861 (notably Bull Run on the Confederate side). The concept of 'combined arms' with cavalry was deemed a failure in the civil war (re: CSA 'Legions' which were single regiments composed of infantry, artillery and cavalry which were quickly split into individual units). Almost over night, cavalry was re-organized into brigades. First brigades were attached to infantry corps, then organized into divisions attached to infantry corps, then individual divisional cavalry corps (Federals were behind the confederates who had corps of cavalry brigades about a year before).

While it may be 'handy', having cavalry as an integrated unit with infantry isn't historic beyond 1862. While the odd brigade had cavalry attached, most were purely infantry (with even artillery being relegated to divisional command, or even Corps command).

Return to “AGEod's American Civil War”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests