User avatar
Heldenkaiser
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 943
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:32 pm
Contact: Website

Battle losses / NM

Thu Jan 21, 2010 7:47 pm

For once, I got an odd battle result.

Image

In spite of basically even casualties (and the Rebs losing 32 guns, we none), this counts as a Reb victory. I can live with that, as Kearny had orders to attack conservatively and probably withdrew at some stage.

But we lost 1 element, the Rebs lost 19, and *we* lose 8 NM? I thought NM loss in battle was tied to elements destroyed? Shouldn't the Rebs have suffered the NM loss? :bonk:
[color="Gray"]"These Savages may indeed be a formidable Enemy to your raw American Militia, but, upon the King's regular & disciplined Troops, Sir, it is impossible they should make any Impression." -- General Edward Braddock[/color]
Colonial Campaigns Club (supports BoA and WiA)
[color="Gray"]"... and keep moving on." -- General U.S. Grant[/color]
American Civil War Game Club (supports AACW)

User avatar
Heldenkaiser
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 943
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:32 pm
Contact: Website

Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:06 pm

Also, unless I am much mistaken I actually gained those 8 NM. I had 105, I won 2 in another battle and I now got 115, difference +8, not -8. Is the text simply backwards? :confused:
[color="Gray"]"These Savages may indeed be a formidable Enemy to your raw American Militia, but, upon the King's regular & disciplined Troops, Sir, it is impossible they should make any Impression." -- General Edward Braddock[/color]

Colonial Campaigns Club (supports BoA and WiA)

[color="Gray"]"... and keep moving on." -- General U.S. Grant[/color]

American Civil War Game Club (supports AACW)

User avatar
arsan
Posts: 6244
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain

Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:14 pm

Mmm... no idea... your gain can be because of some historical event you or the CSA has had :bonk:
By the way, i see you got their Army HQ :blink: Good shooting! :thumbsup:

User avatar
Heldenkaiser
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 943
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2007 12:32 pm
Contact: Website

Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:34 pm

I thought of that, but wouldn't it have been mentioned in the news string?

Also, if I had really lost -8 in this battle, gained +2 in another, and ended up with +10 over the last turn, that event would have brought a staggering +16 NM! Too important to not have been mentioned in the log, don't you think? :confused:

Besides, doesn't it make sense? With this number elements destroyed, I should have had a NM gain, not loss. And it adds up too ...
[color="Gray"]"These Savages may indeed be a formidable Enemy to your raw American Militia, but, upon the King's regular & disciplined Troops, Sir, it is impossible they should make any Impression." -- General Edward Braddock[/color]

Colonial Campaigns Club (supports BoA and WiA)

[color="Gray"]"... and keep moving on." -- General U.S. Grant[/color]

American Civil War Game Club (supports AACW)

User avatar
arsan
Posts: 6244
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain

Thu Jan 21, 2010 8:41 pm

Yes, its strange... :confused:
Its a PBEM?? maybe you can ask your rival.
And if playing against the Ai, you can load as the CSA and check what happened to them NM wise... :)

User avatar
Pat "Stonewall" Cleburne
General of the Army
Posts: 639
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:46 pm
Location: Kentucky

Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:36 pm

It used to be that whoever won the battle would always get the morale boost, even if they lost many many more forces. I've seen it go both ways in 1.15 though and I rarely check to see if the +/- sign is correct.

User avatar
mikee64
Brigadier General
Posts: 413
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 12:13 am
Location: Virginia
Contact: Website

Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:19 pm

This happens sometimes in big battles with large losses and NM swings. Yes the message reporting the loss/gain is indeed incorrect. The NM points are awarded properly.

There are several other posts detailing this, I think one was in the Soundoff/Banks AAR, and I posted an example as well. I'll see if I can track those down.

Pocus even confirmed at one time that it was the report that was worded wrong and the engine was doing the NM right (as you saw).

Edit: Here is one link. Sounds like more info in the "Help Improve" topic as well: Report of incorrect NM loss
Mike

User avatar
arsan
Posts: 6244
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:35 pm
Location: Madrid, Spain

Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:27 pm

Mmm... you may be right! :thumbsup:
It seems the "Battle lost" message includes the "lost" word after the NM number, even if in rare case like this (the USA retreat but after killing a lot of CSA elements including a HQ) a "lost" battle can make you earn some NM :bonk:
Probably it will happen also with the "Battle win" message.

User avatar
mikee64
Brigadier General
Posts: 413
Joined: Thu Jan 25, 2007 12:13 am
Location: Virginia
Contact: Website

Thu Jan 21, 2010 10:36 pm

And here's a thread with an example and the saves: NM loss example

oops, that was the post, here is the thread: Entire Thread
Mike

enf91
AGEod Veteran
Posts: 724
Joined: Sat Dec 06, 2008 6:25 pm

Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:09 am

This has to be one of the most reported quirks. I've seen something like 8 threads on this topic.

User avatar
Gray_Lensman
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
Location: Who is John Galt?

Fri Mar 05, 2010 3:35 am

deleted

User avatar
Clovis
Posts: 3222
Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 7:43 pm
Location: in a graveyard
Contact: Website

Fri Mar 05, 2010 11:02 am

Winning a battle isn't tied to losses but retreat. The retreating side loses the battle whatever the loss ratio.
[LEFT]Disabled
[CENTER][LEFT]
[/LEFT]
[LEFT]SVF news: http://struggleformodding.wordpress.com/

[/LEFT]
[/CENTER]



[/LEFT]

User avatar
fusileer2002
Sergeant
Posts: 90
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 5:56 pm
Location: UK

Thu Mar 11, 2010 2:09 pm

I have had this same situation too in my recent pbem game. As long as the NM seems to go to the deserving side, which it did for us, I'm not too worried about the report text.

Return to “AGEod's American Civil War”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests