In a WIA FIW campaign, this didn't happen. Rather, my two squadrons (eight elements) on Lake Ontario became locked in the ice when the lake froze and then of course "disappeared" over the next two months.
WAD?
![Confused :confused:](./images/smilies/confused.png)
arsan wrote:Maybe you have lost all the friendly ports on the lake??
arsan wrote:You mean you own Fort Niagara??
They cannot go to back Montreal because i'm pretty sure the Lachine Rapids (near Montreal) portage is one way only: Montreal towards Ontario, not the other way around (surely for historical reason, can't tell for sure as i'm no expert on the FIW).
Heldenkaiser wrote:I do.
arsan wrote:Of course if you have different informations and historical sources to prove they are wrong, they will surely want to hear about
Heldenkaiser wrote:I simply can't conceive of an important waterway that works only in one direction. Especially if there is no alternative route back.![]()
lodilefty wrote:Ridiculous.
The portage works both ways. But the port itself
arsan wrote:I've always had problems using the Lachine Rapids downriver to, for example, attack Montreal as the Brits... i though it was just a "one way" portage.But now that i re-think of it it may be because i lacked control of the adjacent land region
(its Montreal?? or La Presentation??)
Cheers
lodilefty wrote:Ridiculous.
The portage works both ways. But the port itself [Montreal] is not an adjacent region to the lake, if I understand where your ships are. The 'move to port' must be to a port that you control in a region immediately adjacent to your ships.
caranorn wrote:As we are sdpeaking of portage. I never noticed a problem with Lake Ontario. But what I have noticed is that you can move bateaux from Montreal to Albany in some scenarios, but not back from Albany to Montreal. Not sure that's intentional...
Gray_Lensman wrote:Lodi...
This "one way" behavior can occur if BOTH regions do not have reciprocal Adjacency/JumpLink/TransLink to each other in their respective *.rgn files. You might look at the specific *.rgn files being referred to above to see if that could possibly be the problem.
This happened in earlier versions of AACW, especially with occasional one-way RR (TransLink) linkages, but it also occasionally showed up in non-reciprocal Adjacency(s) in a few cases.
caranorn wrote:I thought the Champlain to Albany connection was in the 1755 scenario. In fact it's in the 1775 one. The path seems to go through Lake Georges. In this screenshot and attached game I have a bateaux unit at Isle aux Noix that can move to Albany. On the other hand another bateaux unit at Phildadelphia, which could move to Albany via NYC cannot move to Lake Champlain. So the north-south movement is possible, but the south-north not...
P.S.: Can't seem to attach the screenshot, but here's the save game...
Return to “BoA2: Wars in America”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests