On my first move as the British in a FIW campaign scenario, I am experiencing extreme attrition losses, i.e. losses outside of combat situations. To wit: of three stacks that moved, two are practically wiped out, i.e. they haven't lost elements yet as far as I can tell, but almost all elements are nearly completely red. The third stack (Braddock) has some strength left in its regular elements, but the militia units are nearly gone. Heck, even the transport ships that did nothing but move from Boston to Albany lost some of their strength!
Now I realize most of these moves were partly, in one case entirely in winter weather, which seems even more of a no no in BoA2 than in BoA1, and most were for nearly the duration of the turn, which may mean stretching it a bit, or even more than just a bit. I also do see that for those reasons all my armies that moved have their cohesion reduced practically to zero, and I do understand from the manual that cohesion losses will also result in attrition losses. But still, if this it the way it's intended to work, then offensive moves would become next to impossible in this game. Which I don't believe. But then even accounting for severe conditions, losses like these (I would estimate them as exceeding 80% over the board, in all stacks that moved) would seem exceptionally high, would they not?
So, leaving aside that my opening moves may have been rather ill-considered, in excuse of which I can only offer my being un-acquainted with the obviously much harsher attrition formula of BoA2 to compared to BoA1, could some kind soul try to offer me an explanation, along the lines of either "this IS the way it's meant to work, learn to live with it" or "you ARE doing something fundamentally wrong" or "are you sure you're on the latest patch" (I am), or maybe "attrition losses DO seem to be extremely high in BoA2"--any comment will be most welcome. I am not despairing ... yet.
