Leeds
Corporal
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 3:11 pm

Reinforcements and Replacements?

Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:15 pm

Do formations HAVE to be in a town or city to receive reinforcements and or replacements?

Thanks

Coregonas
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1072
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Barcelona-Catalunya

Sat Dec 13, 2008 8:24 pm

no.

however, the ratio of replacements increases depending on the place / ROE.

Best is PASIVE (green) in a Depot... and being CSA doubles replacement ratio.

User avatar
Rafiki
Posts: 5811
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:19 am
Location: Oslo, Norway

Tue Dec 16, 2008 12:41 am

With historical/hardened atrrition, methinks that units have to be at a depot to receive replacments, at least when replacing full elements?

(Not sure at all about this)
[CENTER]Latest patches: AACW :: NCP :: WIA :: ROP :: RUS :: PON :: AJE
Visit AGEWiki - your increasingly comprehensive source for information about AGE games
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
[/CENTER]

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25673
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Tue Dec 16, 2008 11:59 am

Right
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

User avatar
aryaman
Posts: 738
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 6:19 pm

Tue Dec 16, 2008 5:42 pm

Rafiki wrote:With historical/hardened atrrition, methinks that units have to be at a depot to receive replacments, at least when replacing full elements?

(Not sure at all about this)

While I think that was a good way to simulate the replacements system used by most European armies since early XVIII century, it could be less so at least for the Union army during the ACW, for instance
States and localities played a critical role in its recruitment. Typically, a community leader such as a lawyer or politician with the volunteer rank of captain would encourage men to join his company, which when filled would be offered to the state governor. The governor then assigned ten companies to a numbered regiment and appointed a colonel (frequently yet another community leader) to command the regiment. At that point the new regiment would be mustered into federal service and thenceforth paid, fed, and equipped at national expense. the governors tended to see it as a vast opportunity for political patronage, which meant that as regimental numbers diminished through battle casualties and disease. the tendency was to create new regiments rather than make good losses in existing ones. Only Wisconsin maintained an efficient system of replacements to keep veteran units up to strength
http://www.answers.com/topic/union-army-2

User avatar
Eugene Carr
Colonel
Posts: 387
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:58 pm
Location: Dundee, Scotland

Tue Dec 16, 2008 7:22 pm

aryaman wrote:While I think that was a good way to simulate the replacements system used by most European armies since early XVIII century, it could be less so at least for the Union army during the ACW, for instance
States and localities played a critical role in its recruitment. Typically, a community leader such as a lawyer or politician with the volunteer rank of captain would encourage men to join his company, which when filled would be offered to the state governor. The governor then assigned ten companies to a numbered regiment and appointed a colonel (frequently yet another community leader) to command the regiment. At that point the new regiment would be mustered into federal service and thenceforth paid, fed, and equipped at national expense. the governors tended to see it as a vast opportunity for political patronage, which meant that as regimental numbers diminished through battle casualties and disease. the tendency was to create new regiments rather than make good losses in existing ones. Only Wisconsin maintained an efficient system of replacements to keep veteran units up to strength
http://www.answers.com/topic/union-army-2


I think the Union replacement costs are adjusted to represent this, I dont personally treat the replacement screen purely as centralised replacements I also consider it to represent the resources to treat sick details, to send out regimental recruiting parties, and bring back the awol's and exemptions.

S! EC

Leeds
Corporal
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2008 3:11 pm

Thu Dec 18, 2008 3:19 pm

So which is it Depots or not?

User avatar
Jarkko
Colonel
Posts: 365
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 2:34 pm
Location: Finland

Thu Dec 18, 2008 6:45 pm

Leeds wrote:So which is it Depots or not?


As mentioned above, depends on your attrition settings :)
There are three kinds of people: Those who can can count and those who can't.

Return to “AACW Strategy discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 13 guests