Revolutionarythought
Private
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 10:42 am

One thing I don't see...

Mon Feb 11, 2008 11:02 am

A couple campaigns in I've noticed something that bothers me a bit.

I can have an entrenched army, set on defend that the other player, or AI can just walk around.

In some senses this is fine. If an army sees an entrenched enemy, he can choose to try to avoid assaulting a fortified enemy by trying to move around him.

I guess what I'd like to see is the ability to "defend" a region in such a way that you force a battle if an enemy unit tries to move around you.

Its strange that to force a battle, I have to give up all terrain bonuses. It seems that an army during the American Civil war could, and did, position themselves in such a way that the other side would have to attack.

It should be possible, for instance, for general Lee to pick the best terrain the situation allows, putting himself between Federal forces and Richmond.

In guess whats bothering me is that in the game, in order to force a battle with an advancing enemy, I've got to toggle the little button that says I give up all terrain bonuses.

It seems we should be allowed to force a battle, defending, just giving up some (or even most) of the terrain bonuses, but not all.

Just a though.

-Scott

User avatar
Coffee Sergeant
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 260
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Mon Feb 11, 2008 1:25 pm

I thought that if you have < 5% military control of a region, your army would automatically switched to offensive posture.

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25673
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Mon Feb 11, 2008 1:51 pm

indeed. If you control entirely the region, then any opponent advancing on you will auto switch to attack...
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

User avatar
Le Ricain
Posts: 3284
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:21 am
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

Mon Feb 11, 2008 6:38 pm

Pocus wrote:indeed. If you control entirely the region, then any opponent advancing on you will auto switch to attack...


This auto-attack also applies to stacks which are inactive, but are moving into enemy territory. This is the exception to the rule that inactive stacks can not assault or attack. This was tactic in the early days of AACW.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

'Nous voilà, Lafayette'

Colonel C.E. Stanton, aide to A.E.F. commander John 'Black Jack' Pershing, upon the landing of the first US troops in France 1917

User avatar
Coffee Sergeant
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 260
Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 1:31 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:35 pm

Actually in a recent PBEM I tried advancing two corps through enemy held territory helpd by a large Union Corps, when I executed the turn it says the movement was "blocked"

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25673
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Wed Feb 13, 2008 10:45 am

this means there was a residual enemy presence in the region they were in, so you could not penetrate deeper into Union territory.
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

Return to “AACW Strategy discussions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest