User avatar
Gresbeck
Sergeant
Posts: 66
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2006 12:17 pm

Is there any reason not to emancipate?

Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:06 pm

Through emancipation (playing as the Union) I should get 150 VP, 5 NM, and I should lower chance of foreign intervention. Why should I decide not to emancipate?

AndrewKurtz
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:49 am
Location: Greenville, SC

Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:28 pm

Gresbeck wrote:Through emancipation (playing as the Union) I should get 150 VP, 5 NM, and I should lower chance of foreign intervention. Why should I decide not to emancipate?


I ran into that last night. If I understand correctly, the dilema in real life (put into game terms) was that border states loyalty may drop.

Any risk of this in AACW?

veji1
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1271
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:27 pm

Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:35 pm

If I remember correctly, emancipating to early (ie while the CSA looked like it was winning (before Antietam) or could still win (before Gettysburg)) would have looker like a last resort measure, showing the desperation of a Union in dire straits --> loss of national moral, loss of loyalty in bordering states, etc....

This is why it was postponed till after Gettysburg IRL.

so I guess there should be a minimum national moral to reach before being allowed to activate this political decision, say 120 ?

If activated too early, this should provoke a loss in NM, and a surge in confederate NM...

AndrewKurtz
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:49 am
Location: Greenville, SC

Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:40 pm

veji1 wrote:If I remember correctly, emancipating to early (ie while the CSA looked like it was winning (before Antietam) or could still win (before Gettysburg)) would have looker like a last resort measure, showing the desperation of a Union in dire straits --> loss of national moral, loss of loyalty in bordering states, etc....

This is why it was postponed till after Gettysburg IRL.

so I guess there should be a minimum national moral to reach before being allowed to activate this political decision, say 120 ?

If activated too early, this should provoke a loss in NM, and a surge in confederate NM...


One option would be to say the declaration needs to follow within two turns of a Union victory that results in a NM boost, otherwise it has a negative impact...

User avatar
Mr Dimbleby
Private
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Linden, VA

Mon Jun 04, 2007 2:52 pm

veji1 wrote:If I remember correctly, emancipating to early (ie while the CSA looked like it was winning (before Antietam) or could still win (before Gettysburg)) would have looker like a last resort measure, showing the desperation of a Union in dire straits --> loss of national moral, loss of loyalty in bordering states, etc....

This is why it was postponed till after Gettysburg IRL.

so I guess there should be a minimum national moral to reach before being allowed to activate this political decision, say 120 ?

If activated too early, this should provoke a loss in NM, and a surge in confederate NM...


The Emancipation Proclomation was issued after Antietam, and went into effect on 1 January 1863.
"At ease was never that easy to me. I don't relax by parting my legs slightly and putting my hands behind my back. That does not equal ease. At ease is not being in the military. 'I am at ease, bro, because I am not in the military.' " - Mitch Hedberg

veji1
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1271
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:27 pm

Mon Jun 04, 2007 3:10 pm

ooppss, got mixed up with the Gettysburg speech I guess...

User avatar
saintsup
Captain
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 7:22 am

Mon Jun 04, 2007 5:33 pm

In the same sort of questions:

Is there any reason for CSA to move its capitol ?

veji1
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1271
Joined: Fri Dec 08, 2006 6:27 pm

Mon Jun 04, 2007 5:40 pm

Well if you are about to lose Richmond, you better move it or take a "massive" NM loss...

User avatar
runyan99
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:34 am

Mon Jun 04, 2007 5:42 pm

veji1 wrote:so I guess there should be a minimum national moral to reach before being allowed to activate this political decision, say 120 ?

If activated too early, this should provoke a loss in NM, and a surge in confederate NM...


I'd like to see something like that.

User avatar
saintsup
Captain
Posts: 171
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 7:22 am

Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:35 am

veji1 wrote:Well if you are about to lose Richmond, you better move it or take a "massive" NM loss...


My question is why moving TO richmond from the 1st capitol which is way behind the lines ...

User avatar
runyan99
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:34 am

Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:47 am

That happens automatically around the historical date at no cost. You must not have played very much if you haven't come across that yet.

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25673
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:58 am

re Emancipation:

You can't declare it before late 62 and only if you have a morale high enough.

Side effects: you lose loyalty in the border states, as historical.
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

User avatar
runyan99
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:34 am

Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:59 am

Pocus wrote:re Emancipation:

You can't declare it before late 62 and only if you have a morale high enough.



That's good. How high?

AndrewKurtz
Posts: 1167
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 2:49 am
Location: Greenville, SC

Tue Jun 05, 2007 1:32 pm

Pocus wrote:re Emancipation:

You can't declare it before late 62 and only if you have a morale high enough.

Side effects: you lose loyalty in the border states, as historical.


Excellent.

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25673
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Tue Jun 05, 2007 2:55 pm

Image

subliminal message for would-be modders here ;)
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

User avatar
Mr Dimbleby
Private
Posts: 21
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 11:20 pm
Location: Linden, VA

Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:17 pm

Pocus wrote:re Emancipation:

You can't declare it before late 62 and only if you have a morale high enough.

Side effects: you lose loyalty in the border states, as historical.


Is there a side effect that represents the regiments that deserted en masse after the E.P. was announced?
"At ease was never that easy to me. I don't relax by parting my legs slightly and putting my hands behind my back. That does not equal ease. At ease is not being in the military. 'I am at ease, bro, because I am not in the military.' " - Mitch Hedberg

User avatar
runyan99
Posts: 1420
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2006 6:34 am

Tue Jun 05, 2007 6:22 pm

Pocus wrote:
subliminal message for would-be modders here ;)


Thanks for the screen.

80 Morale strikes me as a little too easy for the USA to achieve. I'd suggest 100 as a more fair level.

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25673
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Wed Jun 06, 2007 6:47 am

this has been set at 80 so that the AI has a chance to trigger it too...
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

Conhugeco
Corporal
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 4:44 pm
Location: Maryland

Sat Jun 09, 2007 2:23 am

Mr Dimbleby wrote:Is there a side effect that represents the regiments that deserted en masse after the E.P. was announced?


Yes - they don't because they didn't.

Dick
In response to a critic: "General Lee surrendered to me. He did not surrender to any other Union General, although I believe there were several efforts made in that direction before I assumed command of the armies in Virginia." -- Ulysses Grant

Return to “AGEod's American Civil War”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests