Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:35 pm
Just to add to the above.
PoN is in some ways the most complex of the AGE games in that it has economics, diplomacy, colonialism and warfare. In addition the AGE model of movement and combat is different to that of Paradox so there is sense to trying out one of the campaign style games first as Lindi suggests. The first I played was Rise of Prussia and a combination of the period, scale and flow of that game makes it still one of my favourites. It is probably better to learn the mysteries of stances, CPs, EPs, NM, march to the sound of the guns, supply push et al in the framework of one of their other games.
Having said that, PoN comes with a set of short scenarios that are good to learn the combat aspects. So the Boer War scenario will teach you a lot about how to fight an irregular enemy with a European army - this is something that will happen a lot in any game, PoN models the frustrations of colonial war superbly.
So its a matter of choice. Compared to Victoria 2, PoN stresses realism, if you play Russia, you can't become a liberal democracy, so you have to cope with the problems of Tsarism (at least till Lenin otherthrows you). Its pretty much impossible to take provinces in Europe if you have no claim, so the overall map stays realistic.
If you enjoy V2/HOI3 then there is nothing daunting in the AGE games, they are no more complex, just things are put together differently. In particular the process of putting in your orders and then watching if unfold is very different to Paradox's real time strategy. its also horribly addictive, especially if things are going wrong before your eyes - and there is nothing you can do about it.
AJE The Hero, The Traitor and The Barbarian
PoN Manufacturing Italy; A clear bright sun
RoP The Mightiest Empires Fall
WIA Burning down the Houses; Wars in America; The Tea Wars