Sat May 16, 2009 6:10 am
I also think we need to clarify terms and what they mean here. Runyan's original observations pertain not to a blockade per se, but strike me more as a matter of interdiction. Let me be clear: if I understand Runyan correctly, his original observation pertained to something much like the 'River Rule', where hostile land elements may not cross a navigable river region athwart corresponding land regions. This I would characterize as a Naval Interdiction.
A blockade, however, is interference with commerce, shall we say, in or out of a destination, i. e., a Harbor (or perhaps a coastal Fort as indicated by GL in his list above). Naturally, what I mean is a 'brown' blockade. Now, in order to effect a true BrnBlk by rule in the game, where a particular City/Region/Harbor/Fort suffers adverse consequences, a certain number of naval elements must be present in the corresponding 'blockade point', or 'blockade region' (I'm inventing a term here).
I effect a true BrnBlk on Morehead City, NC, 'cuz I can do so without getting shot at. I don't effect true BrnBlks on Charleston, for the reverse reason - I am content to park off the river mouth, off Ft. Sumter, and interfere with Runners.
If I wish to get up close and tangle with a Fort, I should have to deal with that as an engagement.
And if I have my facts straight, I can support my land forces at Monroe, for example, with Naval Bombardment.
I think you're onto something, GL. Just want to throw in a distinction that you may or may not find useful.
[color="#AFEEEE"]"Liberty and Union, now and forever, one and inseparable!"[/color]
-Daniel Webster
[color="#FFA07A"]"C'mon, boys, we got the damn Yankees on the run!"[/color]
-General Joseph Wheeler, US Army, serving at Santiago in 1898
RULES
(A) When in doubt, agree with Ace.
(B) Pull my reins up sharply when needed, for I am a spirited thoroughbred and forget to turn at the post sometimes.
