vonRocko wrote:One vote for Never? I can't imagine a game where you would never have,at least, one place that you MUST defend{Richmond?} at all costs. I have seen some battles where the defender beats overwhelming odds in this game.As long as that is possible,I will hold at all costs most of the time.
vonRocko wrote:One vote for Never? I can't imagine a game where you would never have,at least, one place that you MUST defend{Richmond?} at all costs.
Banks6060 wrote:I like to use hold at all costs for the defense of important depots... Otherwise I usually try to leave room for retreat.
Daxil wrote:One tactic I find especially pleasing, albeit a little gamey, is anchoring a div to a unit that wont move out of province. Therefore the surprise cav attacks w/out supply are neutralized.
arsan wrote:J. E. Johnston would had disagree with you
I voted seldom. I'm kind of "johnstonian" myself.
No need to die here today if can fight (and kill) another day 20 miles down the road...
tagwyn wrote:But - As JEJ found out in front of Atlanta, you can be outflanked out of any position where the enemy has more troops than you do? His army was willilng to fight and die but they got whipped whenever they tried to make a stand. Right? T
Captain wrote:Ok someone please educate me.
Situation:
Harpers Ferry is held by a lone federal militia. Taking the opportunity south sends a Corp to HF with all out attack to to take it. The North however simitaneously sends to HF a full Federal army.
Question is who is the attacker?
Does the Reb Corp do an all out attack on the whole Fed Army?
If The Fed Army is also on the offensive who is the defender?
Return to “AGEod's American Civil War”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests