Page 1 of 1

Mclellan - better off without him (in leader mod)?

Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 7:38 pm
by briny_norman
I was wondering - are the penalties for not being in an army so great, that even though Mclellan stinks it is still better to have him form an army instead of letting the units form individual divisions under generals with better stats?

I'm thinking about trying out the leader mod and I understand that this mod only gives you two 3 star generals to begin with (Mclellan one of them), thereby sort of forcing you to use him.
An interesting idea - if the answer to my question above is yes, that is.

Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 8:21 pm
by Coregonas
That was the idea. You must give him an army.

Runyan explained that in his mod thread.


However, CSA can not build divisions until late in 61, so you have some extra aid...

Posted: Sun Jun 22, 2008 9:35 pm
by briny_norman
Ok - Mclellan is now in charge of the AotP.
God help us all...