mjw wrote:Its July 1861 and I'm in the process of building up an army or 2. I am interested in taking New Orleans. but there seems to be several ways. One is passing through the two forts at the mouth of the mississippi, the second is the fort at the big lake (please don't make me spell it) and the third is overland.
I am wondering...if I "run" the forst with my fleet and take N.O., can I supply my force if the forts are still in enemy hands? Should I take the forts and then N.O.?
I have farragut standing by with about 10 ships(combat) and some trasnports that will carry about a division sized force. is this enough?
This would also apply to Charleston I guess. Should I take out the forts or "run them"?
I'm assuming you're playing the AI? Might not be. I've seen 12,000 men in New Orleans before with the AI. Against a human it generally depends on the situation (obviously).
As far as running it, I launch my invasion near Fort Pike rather then running up the Mississippi. My normal invasion practice is to send a supply wagon or two with the invasion force, "run" the fort, invade the city itself, and then use the actual invasion forces to clear the fort(s) from the port itself. Usually a brigade is sufficient to clear an unreinforced coastal fort.
I'm probably a poor person to ask. I don't completely understand Naval resupply, so I'm posting in this thread as much for your benefit as mine.
Namely my question is, do forts affect the ability to resupply by Harbor?
For instant, assuming Mobile, if I take Mobile, do the two forts in Mobile bay reduce (or stop) the amount of supplies Mobile's Harbor "pulls"? I assumed they did, hence clearing the fort.
To go a step further, which Forts clear New Orleans? In otherwords, can I clear only Pike and leave the 2 river forts alone?