[color="Red"][SIZE="6"]Early June 62 result and Late June Orders[/size][/color]
Well good people the move did not turn out anywhere near as I'd intended. Banks second guessed virtually my every move. Fortunately, as I'd not overcommitted myself I dont think I've been significantly harmed. Just temporarily checked. Mind you perhaps thats wishful thinking on my part. Time will tell.
[SIZE="3"]EASTERN THEATRE[/size]
Virginia.
Sadly Grant never got past the starting line. My adversary shuffled his forces to his left effectively blocking his line of advance. A battle ensued at Appomattox. Grants forces were repulsed and retired back to Amherst.
Now before I move on at this point I'd just like to take a wee bit of time out to discuss this battle in more detail. In a way it highlights some interesting issues. I think it also demonstrates why, at times, I'm uneasy about battle results. Truth to tell sometimes I reckon they are flawed. Having said that it does not spoil my enjoyment of the game.
OK so to the battle. Now if you look at the report you will see that I had supposedly some 33,000 troops in the area. I say
the area deliberately, rather than the battle, as I think we all know that often times the programme totals all of the units in a region rather than simply the number committed to the engagement.
Now what I had done in planning the move is that I stripped the best divisions from Hamiltons Corp and combined them with the best of Grants. So Grant set off on his march to Petersburg with 4 strong divisions all close to maximum cohesion. Travelling light though - no support units or supply.
Anyway (and this is my take on it). On reaching Appomattox he finds his position blocked by Johnston. Now the programme allows Armies (which Grants is) to fight if its on its own but in this instance sitting back at Amerherst in Hamiltons Corp. Unfortunately Hamiltons force is much depleted (as its minus its best divisions) and has poor cohesion.
.
So with Grant facing a battle, Hamilton Marches to the Guns and his Corp takes over the fighting whilst Grants Army command sits back and gives support but is not directly engaged. Just look at reports 23 to 26.
The upshot is the Union forces are repulsed. Worse still I've lost 3NM. The only saving graces are the losses being roughly equal and better still the CSA losing elements. I can also absorb the losses with greater ease than the CSA.
All of this occurs on day 6
On day 7 Grant and Hamilton are back on the starting line at Amherst. So far so good. Damned irritating that Hamitons Corp fought in Grants place but thats the game with MTG and I know the rules.
Its at this stage though that things start to get interesting and I begin to scratch my head.
Returning to the battle report I lost just over 9,000 men in the battle. I also suffered 46 hits in the retreat. Hamiltons decimated Corp has 12,500 survivors of all types. Grants Army remains at a strength of 30,500.
OK this is the question. Grant is in Appomattox. Hamiltons force MTG's and interposes. So how come the number in the battle is only 33,000? If you ignore Grants force entirely from the equation Hamiltons force was never 33,000 strong to begin with. Also why ar'nt the support units that Hamilton has with him....e.g. the supply units not shown as being present on the battlefield?
I just cannot make head nor tail of the numbers. Grants army HQ is shown as it should be but as to the rest (shrugs shoulders)
I've shown Franklin and Whipples Corps as well. Franklin was in Amherst at the start of the turn but obviously did not MTG. Whipple moved there on day 6. Neither were engaged but I've shown them just to prove the point.
If the peculiarities had ended their I reckon I'd have made no comment in this post but they have not. Now look at reports 63 to 66 (ignore 67 and 68 for now those commanders were not at Appomattox) Hmmm how come my commanders get congratulated for a victory when according to the battle report the Union suffered a defeat and as report 26/68 shown above says the result of the defeat is that I suffer a loss of 3NM
Now it makes even less sense.
And pre-empting the very last aspect it seems as if my NM has actually gone up by 3 and that of my opponent down by 3.
So did I win or lose? You tell me as the reports are definately telling me porkies.
If any of you reckon its worth a
mull over perhaps the open thread is the place
Enough of that though and back to planned moves in
Virginia for the forthcoming turn.
OK so the move turned out pearshaped but Johnstons command is severely damaged. On its own it cannot stand against me. I suspect Banks will move further southwest again with Lee. Mind you I've not been doing very well of late in guessing his moves. He did not send either Jackson or Longstreet to Fredricksburg. Is he really giving that position up without a fight? This time I'm going to test it.
My orders then are as follows. As I cannot afford another episode where Grant has 4 able divisions that do not fight I'm transferring those troops to Hamilton. Hamiltons decimated command I am splitting between Franklin and Whipple both of whose forces need another turn of rest to achieve full cohesion.
Hamilton has orders to assault Burkeville. I still strongly suspect that Huger is in residence. I do not intend to send Hamilton further than Burkeville. I am operating on the assumption that Banks dare not split Jackson or Longstreet away now. Not with Grant and currently three Corps before him.
Dix has been instructed to assault Fredricksburg but by the long route so as to avoid an opposed crossing of the Rappahannock. McDowell who stubbornly remains inactive is to mosey on down at his leisure in support.
Lets see with these two proposed thrusts if I cannot begin to exert some real pressure on the citizens of Richmond.
Kearny reached Garysburg and found it weakly defended with little in the way of support in the surrounding regions. Regrettably he has decided to become inactive this time so its a destroy the rail link order for him and a move to Lynchburg. No sense in keeping his troops in danger at this time.
Pratt at Millboro has orders to assault Christianburg with Sherman at Grafton (now at least with the fair makings of a division) moving to Millboro to replace Pratt.
All in all then a pretty big move for the Union forces. I do hope the president will not be disappointed. In the
Penninsula - no picture this time- Milroy tries to regather his strength. Its a slow old process. His command is still less than 6,000 effectives.
[SIZE="3"]WESTERN THEATRE[/size]
Kentucky/Tennessee
In this theatre my move came unstuck as Banks anticipated me. Richardson attempted to take Gallatin as ordered but found Van Dorn waiting.
Heavy fighting ensued. Again Billy Yank was thrown back. Now I have the Union press howling following these early June setbacks. Although casualties were two to one in the enemies favour it was not a crushing defeat.
Another puzzlement was going back to report 67/68 and 68/68 (see above) Richardson and Runyon were congratulated for the victory? Hmmmmm.
Having retired back to Bowling Green the current situation looks like this. Halleck has 11,000 under his wing and is rapidly constructing a depot. He is inactive (not that I'd have made an offensive move with him this time) Its await developments for now in this area. I may probe at Clarksville in a move or two. Its an option.
Would you
Adam and Eve it. Of course you would, its a recurring theme. Not one active commander. So time for a further bit of reorganisation. Rosecreans has sealed instructions to report to high command in Paducah with 17th Division leaving Foster with 11th, 12th, 19th and 26th Divisions in charge of the Corp at Columbus. My intention being to operate with just two strong Corps (one at Paducah the other at Columbus) - always assuming of course that at sometime during this war they surprise me and decide that its time to move. Little Mac is becoming a pain the the posterior
From the look of it, to the south Polk has 3 divisions plus Forrest's command. I'd estimate around 20,000 whilst AS Johnston has Forney's Corp with him. I reckon about 15,000 strong.
[SIZE="3"]LOWER SEABOARD[/size]
Florida
A couple of things here. Firstly going back over old ground and my inability to receive supplies in the St Joseph region in earlier times. I'm sure you've noticed there is a decent thread on supplies going on in the general forum. Now I'd always believed Pocus's words (quoted by Major Tom) that if you had a depot in a coastal region it would receive supply (not that I'd ever tried it until this game). Other posters in that thread such as my opponent have argued that
'common sense' dictates that you need a harbour as well. Personally I agree with the
'common sense' idea but have always believed that what the game designer/programmer says should be gospel. I've now reached the conclusion that maybe something was lost in translation (as happens to us all) and that you do indeed need a harbour. It would explain why no supply got through.
Back to this move though. Woods command has temporarily been absorbed by Butler until it is fully recovered. Butler has orders to defend Milton.
Joe Hooker landed with his small force, marched on Sparta, carried the undefended town and is reorganising his enlarged force. A bold move is planned for him. A deep strike at the important crossroads and depot at Meridian. With a forced march he can make it. If he can carry it off it places a strong division in an difficult position for the Confederacy as it could strike again in any direction. Hooker has a supply wagon with him so even should the move fail he has every chance of making it back successfully to friendly lines.
[SIZE="3"]TRANSMISSISSIPPI[/size]
Missouri
Still nothing of significance. I'm awaiting what Banks intends to do with Watie.
Texas/Arizona
I was surprised though and dismayed that Sibley attacked Tuscon and carried it. OK so its not earth shattering but its a blow I could have done without. It rounded off a trio of defeats this time.
To the nuts and bolts then
Foreign Intervention - now minus 3
NM - Union 103 CSA 104 (below that magic 105)
Drafts - Offering 2,000 bounty. Expected to raise 410 conscripts at cost of 1NM
Finances - issuing 5% bonds. Expected to raise 310,000 and cost 25VP's Measured Exceptional Taxes raising 349,000 and costing 1NM
Politics - Total Blockade raising 50,000 and gaining 1NM
Replacements - 2 Elite Infantry 5 Line Infantry 2 Skirmish Infantry 2 Field Artillery
Reinforcements -
New York
2 x 2 Infantry and 1x6lb Artillery brigades
2 x 3 Infantry, 1x6lb Artillery and 1 Cavalry brigades
New Jersey
2 x 12lb Artillery batteries
Connecticut
2 x 2 Infantry brigades
Pennsylvania
2 x 2 Infantry and 1 Sharpshooter brigades
2 x 2 Infantry 1x6lb and 1 Cavalry brigades