Evening!
Stemming from my recent experiences with several other players I came up with this odd idea:
How about setting up a kind of "whitelist" in which players can mention names of opponents whom to have played with they felt to be especially enjoyable, along with their reasons for their judgement? Surely, as as small as the community is now, that list might not be particulary long yet, but as time goes by and AGEod inevitably conquers the gaming universe it might be a useful tool to identify the "best" opponents (in terms of fun) beforehand without excluding others. It would also be a nice way to give an opponent a well-deserved public in a "Hall of Fame" way.
Please note that I do not want to imply that people who have not yet "made the list" are not worth playing with, in any way!
I would also be strongly opposed to setting up an opposite "blacklist" of players who in somebodies perception are "not fun" to play with. Reasons why people don't get along wiith each other are as many as they are subjective and while player A and player B might not relate too well to each other they may get off with player C or D respectively like a bonfire. Also the reasons why a player may be forced to slow down the pace of a game or break it off entirely are many and not easily to be judged fairly by others. Anyways, these are matters better not to be discussed in public, methinks.
Well, what do You think?
Regards, Henry