-
pgr
- General of the Army
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 9:33 pm
- Location: Paris France (by way of Wyoming)
Gray Fox has officially confirmed his departure.
Has Dobbins1 or Skibear started any of their games? Illustrated_Man is currently the back up for Dobbins1. If dobbins1 is activly playing, I will place Illustrated Man in Gray Fox's old spot.
Also, Lindi and I have decided to double host our match (as in each player alternates hosting the turn). If you are in a game that has the players but no host, and you both agree, I have no problem with one of the two players hosting (or the match being played by double hosting).
Finally, if your game is listed as Not started on the top of the thread, please post when you start so I can update the status of your match.
Has Dobbins1 or Skibear started any of their games? Illustrated_Man is currently the back up for Dobbins1. If dobbins1 is activly playing, I will place Illustrated Man in Gray Fox's old spot.
Also, Lindi and I have decided to double host our match (as in each player alternates hosting the turn). If you are in a game that has the players but no host, and you both agree, I have no problem with one of the two players hosting (or the match being played by double hosting).
Finally, if your game is listed as Not started on the top of the thread, please post when you start so I can update the status of your match.
If I may notice, I 've been erased from the pool A instead of Gray Fox 
But this is not the reason for my post. I wanted to suggest a change in the group stage pairings. So far, these are the players that have shown up to the tournament (if I interpreted the above posts correctly, so no Gray Fox, Jagdfluger, dobbins1, Ski bear).
Pool A:
Ace
Citizen X
Guru94
Pool B:
Planefinder
Highland Charge
FelixZ
Pool C:
Jim-NC
Lindi
Pgr
Pool D:
Liberty Bell
Havi
moni kerr
Since the purpose of the group stage is to fill out playoff spots, here is my proposal. Why don't we put all remaining 12 players to one group, with the players who have not started their matches pairing against each other. Out of this group, top 8 could advance to the quarters. All previous AACW tournaments have been plagued by long duration. This would shorten it a bit.
But this is not the reason for my post. I wanted to suggest a change in the group stage pairings. So far, these are the players that have shown up to the tournament (if I interpreted the above posts correctly, so no Gray Fox, Jagdfluger, dobbins1, Ski bear).
Pool A:
Ace
Citizen X
Guru94
Pool B:
Planefinder
Highland Charge
FelixZ
Pool C:
Jim-NC
Lindi
Pgr
Pool D:
Liberty Bell
Havi
moni kerr
Since the purpose of the group stage is to fill out playoff spots, here is my proposal. Why don't we put all remaining 12 players to one group, with the players who have not started their matches pairing against each other. Out of this group, top 8 could advance to the quarters. All previous AACW tournaments have been plagued by long duration. This would shorten it a bit.
-
pgr
- General of the Army
- Posts: 669
- Joined: Fri Jan 24, 2014 9:33 pm
- Location: Paris France (by way of Wyoming)
Ace wrote:If I may notice, I 've been erased from the pool A instead of Gray Fox
But this is not the reason for my post. I wanted to suggest a change in the group stage pairings. So far, these are the players that have shown up to the tournament (if I interpreted the above posts correctly, so no Gray Fox, Jagdfluger, dobbins1, Ski bear).
Pool A:
Ace
Citizen X
Guru94
Pool B:
Planefinder
Highland Charge
FelixZ
Pool C:
Jim-NC
Lindi
Pgr
Pool D:
Liberty Bell
Havi
moni kerr
Since the purpose of the group stage is to fill out playoff spots, here is my proposal. Why don't we put all remaining 12 players to one group, with the players who have not started their matches pairing against each other. Out of this group, top 8 could advance to the quarters. All previous AACW tournaments have been plagued by long duration. This would shorten it a bit.
Got you back in Ace! Of the top of my head, we have been having problems with Gray, Dobbins1, Skibear, and Jagdfluger. Which works out pretty well because that is 1 for each group. The challenge is going to be keeping the games going that have started, while setting up a new paring for the folks that loose a match. PM me Ace, and we'll set up a revised matchup list.
-
Liberty Bell
- Captain
- Posts: 179
- Joined: Wed Mar 12, 2014 1:34 pm
- Location: Gothia
I just got confirmation from Lindi that dobbins has not yet contacted him (and he is his host).
That is not the way to participate in the tournament. So, I would like pgr to consider my revised list I have sent him, with 12 active players grouped into 4 groups (basically the same groups as now, but without unresponsive players). And each group having 3 participants with 2 matches played. Top 2 from each group advancing to the next stage (only the last player in the group does not continue the tournament).
If he approves it, he will post the changes. The bottom line is every started match is continuing as nothing has happened.
That is not the way to participate in the tournament. So, I would like pgr to consider my revised list I have sent him, with 12 active players grouped into 4 groups (basically the same groups as now, but without unresponsive players). And each group having 3 participants with 2 matches played. Top 2 from each group advancing to the next stage (only the last player in the group does not continue the tournament).
If he approves it, he will post the changes. The bottom line is every started match is continuing as nothing has happened.
-
Highlandcharge
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 11:44 am
-
charlesonmission
- Posts: 781
- Joined: Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:55 am
- Location: USA (somewhere)
-
planefinder
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 8:34 pm
charlesonmission wrote:Will there be status reports like last time?
Charles
Once first few turns are complete, I strongly encourage each host to write a short report on how each game is going.
Jim-NC (USA) vs pgr (CSA) (Trn 5 played out)
Overall, Jim is doing well, slowly pushing towards Corinth and Memphis with the Army of Tennessee. But, Jim got careless a little and tried to repeat history with Butler landing at New Orleans. But, pgr obviously had the knowledge of historic errors his historic counterparts did, and has prepared accordingly.
[ATTACH]27092[/ATTACH]
Given the scale of this defeat, US is actually in a good situation VP wise, and still has the chance to recuperate.
[ATTACH]27093[/ATTACH]
Prior to this turn, US had virtually no losses at all, maybe that is why he got careless.
- Attachments
-
-
-
Highlandcharge
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 11:44 am
In both my games I had developments that, so I presume and guess, would have been going in another fashion, had it not been for the battle reports being posted here. I wouldn't yell at anybody posting reults and such here but go figure if really need be. Maybe without pictures and names of generals? Just two sentences of the overall standing?
"I am here already.", said the hedgehog to the hare.
Citizen X wrote:In both my games I had developments that, so I presume and guess, would have been going in another fashion, had it not been for the battle reports being posted here. I wouldn't yell at anybody posting reults and such here but go figure if really need be. Maybe without pictures and names of generals? Just two sentences of the overall standing?
I guess you mean your preparations of an attack on Nasville I revealed that Lindi also reported about in his little AAR. I can assure you that I did not consider that as an option for the South because of the AAR. I played quite a few pbem games in the old AACW and know a lot of options for the Confederates in the west that of course work in CW2 also.
Guru94 wrote:I guess you mean your preparations of an attack on Nasville I revealed that Lindi also reported about in his little AAR. I can assure you that I did not consider that as an option for the South because of the AAR. I played quite a few pbem games in the old AACW and know a lot of options for the Confederates in the west that of course work in CW2 also.
No
"I am here already.", said the hedgehog to the hare.
Return to “PBEM and multiplayer matchups (all games)”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests