User avatar
rickd79
Colonel
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:40 pm
Location: Connecticut

Richard S. Ewell

Thu Feb 01, 2007 11:48 pm

Richard S. Ewell:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_S._Ewell

156 CSA Richard S. Ewell ldr_CSA_Ewell2 NULL NULL NULL NULL 6 5 2 13 General 1 NULL 4 2 1

184 CSA Richard S. Ewell ldr_CSA_Ewell NULL NULL NULL NULL 1 1 1 11 General 1 NULL 4 2 1

Ewell seems like another good opportunity to rate a general a little higher at the Division level than the Corps level. He was "superb" under Jackson during the Valley Campaign of 1862 (see wikipedia entry for some examples).

However, after he recovered from his leg amputation, and was promoted to Corps command in 1863, his performance suffered. Was this due to the injury, or was he simply out of his element at the higher command level? (I'm not going to criticize Ewell for the First Day at Gettysburg and the infamous "Take that hill is practicable" incident. Of his 3 divisions, Rhodes' had taken an absolute pounding, Early's men had been more successful but would need time to reform, and Johnson's division was just getting to the field. Additionally, he had intelligence to suggest that he might be flanked if he made the attack. Would his attack have suceeded if he had sent his men in....debatable.) Ewell also struggled during the 1864 Overland campaign and was eventually removed from command of the II Corps.

Here are the settings I would recommend:
156 CSA Richard S. Ewell ldr_CSA_Ewell2 NULL NULL NULL NULL 6 5 2 13 General 1 NULL 4 2 1

184 CSA Richard S. Ewell ldr_CSA_Ewell NULL NULL NULL NULL 1 1 1 11 General 1 NULL 4 3 2

Chris0827
General
Posts: 522
Joined: Fri Jan 12, 2007 9:39 pm
Location: Florida

Fri Feb 02, 2007 12:04 am

I would lower his strategic rating as a corps commander to 3. He failure to act caused problems at the Wilderness and Spotsylvania as well as Gettysburg.

User avatar
rickd79
Colonel
Posts: 347
Joined: Wed Jan 24, 2007 12:40 pm
Location: Connecticut

Sun Feb 04, 2007 3:57 pm

If you have the new nickname "trait" to add flavor: "Baldy" for Richard Ewell

User avatar
Korrigan
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1982
Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 12:33 pm
Location: France

Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:58 pm

New proposition:

156 CSA Richard S. Ewell ldr_CSA_Ewell2 NULL NULL NULL NULL 6 5 2 13 General 1 NULL 2 3 1
184 CSA Richard S. Ewell ldr_CSA_Ewell NULL NULL NULL NULL 1 1 1 11 General 1 NULL 4 4 1
"Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference." Mark Twain

Image

woodcojb
Conscript
Posts: 16
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 7:29 pm

Tue Aug 10, 2010 12:05 pm

No problem with Ewell the division commander, but Ewell the corps commander should be a 2-2-2.

Return to “Officers room”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests