Orders incompatibility
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2007 2:27 pm
I've noticed, building the stack/icon/order identification guide, that it is possible to set posture of a stack commanded by an active leader in offensive/assault and, at the same time, issue the "Evade Combat" order.
It's a bit misleading, don't you think? I tell the general to attack but also to evade combat...shouldn't this order be allowed only to active leaders in passive posture...and doesn't the passive posture itself ask the leaders NOT to engage but to evade already?
Another issue, the "entrenchment" icon is basically always lit on the top of my stacks with the only possible exception of "all cav" and "all support" stacks.
When i order an entrenching/entrenched stack to move, shouldn't this icon disappear (and reappear if i delete the order movement)? I am actually ordering them to leave the trenches and certainly they can't entrench while on the move, no?
Shouldn't the entrenchement icon (and relative entrenchement level *under* the stack) appear only in the resolution phase on armies that i didn't move that turn and remain if i keep not moving them?
Edit: I also detached a single supply wagon to send it elsewhere and it kept the posture.
I think lone leaders (single unit) and independent forces consisting of sole supply (supply wagons and/or arty) or sole leader+supply should have a permanent passive posture.
I also got intrigued about the posture of my raiding party entering in defensive posture in enemy region (shouldn't they enter at least offensively or, passively when enemy MC <25%?). What about regions with enemy towns? Is it ok a def/pass posture may capture a town? Shouldn't they be off/ass automatically when entering region with enemy settlement despite the garrison presence (def/pass doesn't cope with "capture settlement" imho).
Lastly, if def/pass posture still increase MC (as proper imho) when i leave a town in low loyalty shouldn't this town switch to the enemy side again or at least, revolt?
(Re:edited - 3rd revision of concepts)
....i'm a seriously puzzled now.
It's a bit misleading, don't you think? I tell the general to attack but also to evade combat...shouldn't this order be allowed only to active leaders in passive posture...and doesn't the passive posture itself ask the leaders NOT to engage but to evade already?
Another issue, the "entrenchment" icon is basically always lit on the top of my stacks with the only possible exception of "all cav" and "all support" stacks.
When i order an entrenching/entrenched stack to move, shouldn't this icon disappear (and reappear if i delete the order movement)? I am actually ordering them to leave the trenches and certainly they can't entrench while on the move, no?
Shouldn't the entrenchement icon (and relative entrenchement level *under* the stack) appear only in the resolution phase on armies that i didn't move that turn and remain if i keep not moving them?
Edit: I also detached a single supply wagon to send it elsewhere and it kept the posture.
I think lone leaders (single unit) and independent forces consisting of sole supply (supply wagons and/or arty) or sole leader+supply should have a permanent passive posture.
I also got intrigued about the posture of my raiding party entering in defensive posture in enemy region (shouldn't they enter at least offensively or, passively when enemy MC <25%?). What about regions with enemy towns? Is it ok a def/pass posture may capture a town? Shouldn't they be off/ass automatically when entering region with enemy settlement despite the garrison presence (def/pass doesn't cope with "capture settlement" imho).
Lastly, if def/pass posture still increase MC (as proper imho) when i leave a town in low loyalty shouldn't this town switch to the enemy side again or at least, revolt?
(Re:edited - 3rd revision of concepts)
....i'm a seriously puzzled now.
