Page 1 of 1
Seniority of British generals
Posted: Sat Nov 03, 2012 7:14 am
by Ace
In my recent game, I had a British general upset because he didn't receive command of the Army of Tennessee. I don't think that's what the developers intended, the Brits should only be upset if someone bypasses them for an Army command within their own nation
.
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 5:23 pm
by khbynum
He couldn't have done any worse than Braxton Bragg.
Posted: Mon Nov 05, 2012 10:40 pm
by Longshanks
Ace wrote:In my recent game, I had a British general upset because he didn't receive command of the Army of Tennessee. I don't think that's what the developers intended, the Brits should only be upset if someone bypasses them for an Army command within their own nation
.
That's a first! Just when you think you've seen it all .... nice catch, Ace!
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 4:43 pm
by Stauffenberg
Ace wrote:In my recent game, I had a British general upset because he didn't receive command of the Army of Tennessee. I don't think that's what the developers intended, the Brits should only be upset if someone bypasses them for an Army command within their own nation
.
I've raised this issue a number of times and suggested all foreign generals be given radically lower seniority to avoid this.
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:23 pm
by Ace
Well, promoting Watie didn't cause any resentment from senior generals. So, there is no issue with promotions, only with Army commands.
Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 7:52 pm
by Stauffenberg
Ace wrote:Well, promoting Watie didn't cause any resentment from senior generals. So, there is no issue with promotions, only with Army commands.
That's what I meant.
I also noted that attempting to rebuild, or build a new British or French division will subtract from the CSA count, whatever it is at that moment in time.
You can also take a foreign Army HQ and form a new CSA army with it as I recall.