Seniority of British generals

[Ace]

In my recent game, I had a British general upset because he didn't receive command of the Army of Tennessee. I don't think that's what the developers intended, the Brits should only be upset if someone bypasses them for an Army command within their own nation .

[khbynum]

He couldn't have done any worse than Braxton Bragg.

[Longshanks]

In my recent game, I had a British general upset because he didn't receive command of the Army of Tennessee. I don't think that's what the developers intended, the Brits should only be upset if someone bypasses them for an Army command within their own nation .

That's a first! Just when you think you've seen it all .... nice catch, Ace!

[Stauffenberg]

In my recent game, I had a British general upset because he didn't receive command of the Army of Tennessee. I don't think that's what the developers intended, the Brits should only be upset if someone bypasses them for an Army command within their own nation .

I've raised this issue a number of times and suggested all foreign generals be given radically lower seniority to avoid this.

[Ace]

Well, promoting Watie didn't cause any resentment from senior generals. So, there is no issue with promotions, only with Army commands.

[Stauffenberg]

Well, promoting Watie didn't cause any resentment from senior generals. So, there is no issue with promotions, only with Army commands.

That's what I meant.

I also noted that attempting to rebuild, or build a new British or French division will subtract from the CSA count, whatever it is at that moment in time.
You can also take a foreign Army HQ and form a new CSA army with it as I recall.