Battle mechanics and Naval support
Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 6:23 pm
Hi everybody,
I am curious how does naval support affects land battles.
I recently had an battle in which I attacked a port. Beside 3 divisions defending a port, port hosted a large Union fleet.
I reckoned, if I could capture the town, I could seize the port and capture anchored shipping.
So I attacked with 5 divisions grouped together in a Stonewall Jackson corps having a 2281:1687 strength advantage.
Opponent was in level 2 entrenchments defending in a swamp region. That is a big advantage, but I reckoned it was nullified by better general, higher national morale and above all by chain of command structure.
Union troops were formed in two separate stacks to avoid command penalty, while I was in full corps, which should have been a big disadvantage. I expected a 50:50 battle which could go either way. I assumed, the possible gain justified the risk.
And I got a whooping defeat.
I am not sure, is the defeat because of union fleet involvement in battle.
When I look at battle report, Union guns where 3:1 more numerous than Confederate guns, and 80% of those guns were from ships. Big number of men listed in in battle report were also from ships .
I thought, from experience in shore bombardment that shipping effect would be of far less importance.
What are your experiences?
I am posting a 2 day battle report.
I am curious how does naval support affects land battles.
I recently had an battle in which I attacked a port. Beside 3 divisions defending a port, port hosted a large Union fleet.
I reckoned, if I could capture the town, I could seize the port and capture anchored shipping.
So I attacked with 5 divisions grouped together in a Stonewall Jackson corps having a 2281:1687 strength advantage.
Opponent was in level 2 entrenchments defending in a swamp region. That is a big advantage, but I reckoned it was nullified by better general, higher national morale and above all by chain of command structure.
Union troops were formed in two separate stacks to avoid command penalty, while I was in full corps, which should have been a big disadvantage. I expected a 50:50 battle which could go either way. I assumed, the possible gain justified the risk.
And I got a whooping defeat.

I am not sure, is the defeat because of union fleet involvement in battle.
When I look at battle report, Union guns where 3:1 more numerous than Confederate guns, and 80% of those guns were from ships. Big number of men listed in in battle report were also from ships .
I thought, from experience in shore bombardment that shipping effect would be of far less importance.
What are your experiences?
I am posting a 2 day battle report.