But the only direct affects of having low loyalty in a region are that partisans could be generated there -please correct me if I am wrong or missing something.
From the manual:Loyalty:
... High Loyalty within a region will give the following benefits:
Effects
· You don’t need to garrison Objectives in order to earn VP’s.
· The locals will provide you some intelligence as to the enemy’s whereabouts
· The region will produce more Supply, Resources, and Money
· If the enemy occupies a region loyal to your side without leaving enough of a garrison, its Military Control will gradually shift in your favor and there is a chance that Partisans will appear in the region
· If a region is very hostile to the occupant (10% or less Loyalty), non-garrisoned cities may even openly revolt, in which case an enemy unit will appear and take control of the city
So suspending Habeas Corpus could alleviate you from having to garrison cities to prevent the good towns people from revolting, but that certainly wouldn't prevent other units, such as partisans gathered from elsewhere, from riding in to town and taking over and/or destroying depots. So IMHO it's not a very good strategy to protect your cities.
Declaring Martial Law will raise the minimum loyalty to 30% thus possibly lessening the chances of partisans from appearing in that state, but at a cost of VPs.
I personally never use either. I garrison every city and harbor that I 'liberate' with at least a militia regiment. Those pesky partisans are held at bay by this and simply have nowhere where they can really do anything. Of course, I've only played against Athena until now. A human player might whip my behind with this strategy
