AGEOD Forums

Posted: **Tue Apr 01, 2014 3:21 am**

Definitely To End All Wars.

Posted: **Tue Apr 01, 2014 6:12 am**

This is great news!

Posted: **Tue Apr 01, 2014 6:27 am**

Um… .yes please

Posted: **Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:30 pm**

I voted To End all Wars.

But I have a concern, could this affect sales to more casual gamers or new people to AGEOD?

Posted: **Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:02 pm**

100 years anniversary ... it is good idea make AGEOD Great War game ... "To End all Wars" is better for me ... but I hope it is not The End all AGEOD war games :cool:

Posted: **Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:51 pm**

First of all, great news.

I've voted for To End All Wars... it's more identifiable, and I think a better acronym is made TEOW >> POG

Posted: **Wed Apr 02, 2014 7:28 am**

you mean TEAW.

Posted: **Wed Apr 02, 2014 12:57 pm**

Great news for WWI game, WWI gold was nice but a regiment/brigade/division sized rather than a corps sized game would be even better ! (hope for an old school map)

Voted for To End all wars, has a better ring to it than Price of Glory that is a bit generic.

Another possibility: Graveyard of Empires.

Posted: **Wed Apr 02, 2014 10:44 pm**

Just noticed that there exists a recent (2011) book, by Adam Hochschild, named exactly "To End all Wars"

Maybe some copyright issues with that name ?

Regards

Posted: **Thu Apr 03, 2014 8:09 am**

To End All Wars... :thumbsup:

Posted: **Thu Apr 03, 2014 1:12 pm**

To end all wars!

Posted: **Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:25 pm**

To End All Wars.

Posted: **Fri Apr 04, 2014 1:20 pm**

I have voted for "To End All Wars". I think its an original name for a computer game. "Price of Glory" doesnt is related to the timeframe so well than the other one.

Posted: **Fri Apr 04, 2014 6:30 pm**

voted for "To End All Wars". it was the common idea then....at least until 1918 ...versailles..., and on the other hand it s a title with a taste of...novelty

Posted: **Sat Apr 05, 2014 1:08 am**

To End All Wars

Price of Glory is (a) too generic (b) has the same acronym (PoG) as Paths of Glory, the Ted Raicer boardgame of WW1, which might confuse things.

Would 'War to end wars' be better, though?

Posted: **Mon Apr 07, 2014 3:32 am**

to end all wars

Posted: **Mon Apr 07, 2014 4:58 am**

Can't vote for some reason, but will go with "To End All Wars".

Posted: **Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:26 am**

The limit to vote was 6th april, now the poll is closed.

Ummm maybe we can see a specific section in Newest releases and upcoming games after it has name???

Posted: **Wed Apr 09, 2014 4:56 pm**

Too late but "to end all wars" is great.

I hope that the game will keep the good features of WW1 Gold (battleplans, active diplomacy, war economy, technological progress, pre-planned major offensives) and ereases the defaults (non-user friendly, weird army managment, numerous bugs, ...).

Don"t take the path of "Commander the Great War" which, i find, lacks depth.

Posted: **Wed Apr 09, 2014 6:58 pm**

Revan wrote:Too late but "to end all wars" is great.

I hope that the game will keep the good features of WW1 Gold (battleplans, active diplomacy, war economy, technological progress, pre-planned major offensives) and ereases the defaults (non-user friendly, weird army managment, numerous bugs, ...).

Don"t take the path of "Commander the Great War" which, i find, lacks depth.

BTW, *depth* would be a perfect keyword for evolving the AGE battle engine & rules of engagement towards WW1...

Anyhow, any info planned before the Slitherixeod big time teasing in this Italian castle?

Anything at all?

Posted: **Sat Apr 26, 2014 9:01 pm**

When will it be released?? I'm anxious to play it already!

Posted: **Tue Apr 29, 2014 12:14 pm**

Less than 3 months to the centenary... maybe time to open a thread for the game??? ummm i am going to open one in general to ask this.

AGEOD Forums

A request to the Ageod Community (new game topic revealed inside!)