Page 1 of 1

Which one would you recommend?

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 8:26 pm
by gchristie
When I was young, I had time but little money. Now I am older and have money but little time. That being said, I'm happy to pay AGEOD full price for their great games. My question, with so little time to play, which one to buy? I have AACW and enjoy it very much. If I was to buy only one more, which one would folks recommend?

Happy Holidays.

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:00 pm
by Longhairedlout
Hi, I own AACW, WIA and NCP and I have to say that I enjoy WIA as much as AACW, NCP is good but it lacks a full epic campaign like AACW, I would recommend WIA, it has the full war of Independence campaign and the full French and Indian war as well as various smaller scenarios.

Also Rise of Prussia is hopefully going to be released in late January, Ive read in the forums that it has a full campaign covering the whole seven years war, Im going to get that one as well :)

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:34 pm
by Carnium
For now WiA. Great to get into, fun scenarios, regular updates and a lot to learn from too.
NPC had potential, but as it was already said, it lacks a full campaign. Scenarios are quite fun to play and if you are short on time, you can try it.
WW1 will be updated to gold version and it seems that it will be well worth the money if you dont already have the "original" version.
ROP will be great... just my feeling :thumbsup:

If money is not an issue, then I suggest you get them all. I did and was never sorry for it. Great companies deserve support :coeurs:

Posted: Wed Dec 16, 2009 11:38 pm
by arsan
+1 for WIA :thumbsup:

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 12:14 am
by Rafiki
+1 WIA here too. I especially like WIA for the wide range of scenarios, both in size/length and in complexity. You should be able to find something you want to play, no matter how much time you have available.

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 3:04 am
by gchristie
I'm sold. WIA it is.

Thanks, gentlemen. :hat:

Posted: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:04 am
by caranorn
Good choice as I'd have recommended the same :-) ...