ReneTS
Corporal
Posts: 58
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2015 5:26 pm

Where to put guard units?

Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:18 am

Hi

Can guard units still be committed if placed under a division commander? Or do they need to be placed directly in an army stack?

User avatar
PhilThib
Posts: 13705
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2005 5:21 pm
Location: Meylan (France)

Mon Jun 13, 2016 7:39 am

To be committed, Guards must be with a general with the 'Guard Commit' ability Having them in a division has no impact whatsoever. Only the cpmmanding officer matters
Image

RebelYell
General of the Army
Posts: 608
Joined: Sun Oct 17, 2010 4:40 pm

Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:28 am

PhilThib wrote:To be committed, Guards must be with a general with the 'Guard Commit' ability Having them in a division has no impact whatsoever. Only the cpmmanding officer matters


Stack commander or battle commander?

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25673
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Mon Jun 13, 2016 8:43 am

PhilThib wrote:To be committed, Guards must be with a general with the 'Guard Commit' ability Having them in a division has no impact whatsoever. Only the cpmmanding officer matters



Let me rephrase PhilThib sentence. 'Committed' means The Guard takes precedence and is prioritized before any other unit when filling the front and support lines.

But if the frontage is too vast for the non-guard units, guards will fill the holes. So it is possible to fight guards on any occasion where a stack is overwhelmed or with not enough troops to fight with common rank and file units.
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

vaalen
AGEod Guard of Honor
Posts: 1229
Joined: Thu Dec 20, 2007 8:48 pm

Wed Jun 15, 2016 6:11 pm

Pocus wrote:Let me rephrase PhilThib sentence. 'Committed' means The Guard takes precedence and is prioritized before any other unit when filling the front and support lines.

But if the frontage is too vast for the non-guard units, guards will fill the holes. So it is possible to fight guards on any occasion where a stack is overwhelmed or with not enough troops to fight with common rank and file units.


Thank you for this. It answers a question I was going to ask. And it makes perfect sense!

User avatar
Captain_Orso
Posts: 5766
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 5:02 pm
Location: Stuttgart, Germany

Thu Jun 16, 2016 3:51 pm

RebelYell wrote:Stack commander or battle commander?


From PhilThib's statement, they must simply be under the command of a leader with the Commit the Guards ability.

So if they are in a division, it would be enough for the division commander to have the ability.

If their division commander does not have the ability, but their corps commander does, that would work too.

If neither has the ability, but the army commander has it, and the army commander is commanding the battle, that too would suffice.

But in the last case, if the army commander had to MTSG to commit the guards, that would be rather chancy.

The safest bet would be to explicitly give a commander with the Commit the Guards ability command over these units; either through division or corps command, or having them in an army stack with an army commander with the ability.
Image

Return to “Wars of Napoleon”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests