Durk wrote:I am not sure I can agree with either of you. While Britain did gain some significant support from its home front after the invasion of Belgium, there is almost no documentation that Britain wish to avoid the coming war. To have the scenario play out as you wish, the game would need to back up at least to 1905. By 1914, Britain's involvement was inevitable.
A 'what if' series of scenarios would, indeed, be interesting, the historical reality is that by 1914 Britain would intervene no matter which course Germany followed.
Durk wrote:I am not sure I can agree with either of you. While Britain did gain some significant support from its home front after the invasion of Belgium, there is almost no documentation that Britain wish to avoid the coming war. To have the scenario play out as you wish, the game would need to back up at least to 1905. By 1914, Britain's involvement was inevitable.
A 'what if' series of scenarios would, indeed, be interesting, the historical reality is that by 1914 Britain would intervene no matter which course Germany followed.
fred zeppelin wrote:When I first got the game, I assumed that the campaign with the early start date would include a diplomacy round where nations could try to influence the diplomatic situation before the shooting started. Very disappointed to find, instead, that the early campaign is nothing more than a means to pick ahistorical war plans. Seems to me they missed a perfect opportunity to add a bit of strategy to the game.
Altaris wrote:I understand the stances taken of possibly keeping Britain out of the war. However, doing so presents certain problems well illustrated in this post. Without British support, the French are pretty much incapable of putting serious pressure on the Germans by themselves, which would lead to the Central Powers being able to maul Russia pretty much at will. If Russia was beaten and broken, the Germans could then easily make short work of the French (even if the British decided to become involved at this point).
If France stays out of the war completely, then it's not much of a WW1 game then, and becomes fairly lop-sided in favor of the Central Powers.
I also personally don't think the British would've ever sat back for any real length of time and let Germany becomes masters of the continent. There would just be too much risk, with the German High Seas fleet having become as powerful as it was, to Britain's safety. Had Germany not embarked on it's naval expansion, then I could see the British maintaining their historical neutrality to continental events, but by 1914 that shipped had sailed, so to speak. Yes, it may have taken longer to bring the British national mood around to war, but I think it would've happened by early 1915 at the latest.
Merlin wrote:Also, don't forget the treaties which formed the Triple Entente in the first place were still in effect, and if it's one thing GB has always taken seriously, it's treaties.
Shri wrote:England will and will and will enter any war whatsoever when the opponent is threatening the English Position.
If you have any more doubts please consult- Prof. Paul Kennedy's MAGNUM OPUS of Europe (500 years of history) or AJP Taylor or even Keegan (people quoting Keegan forget that Keegan always says the English will enter the war and also repeatedly berates the English and French for following duplicity, having colonies and then crying foul over German colonies, crying wolf over Belgian neutrality and then breaking Greek neutrality etc).
In realpolitik, there is no good or bad, Imperial Germany was perhaps the Best Government the Germans have had in 500 years since pre- 30 year war and British Propaganda made it look like Dr. Frankenstein Govt, the English were busy butchering Africa and Asia and building concentration camps worldwide in that time period.
But, whenever a NAVAL power has emerged England Fights - that is the only English Law which they adhere to.
Let me quote a really great English PM - Young Mr. Pitt (Stopped & reversed runaway Inflation - the true reason for the French and Russian Revolutions, Formed the basis for the absolute imposition of Gold Standard, Made Britain the universal Hegemon for a century, Abolished Slavery- died before the bill passed, Was the most Honest of men in an age of Dis Honesty et all, is mostly forgotten today as he did not write propaganda but instead did real work), when asked in Parliament what does England have to do with the nonsensical European War breaking out again (by the opposition, who as usual had no clue about guillotines and Napoleon); and further, he was asked to explain in a single sentence.
He replied- i will give the answer in one word- SECURITY.
So, England has to go to War, only when is the concern of the game.
I had written this 'approx. time value earlier', do so again-
Schlieffen- immediate.
Any plan + Fleet Sorties towards the Atlantic/North Sea- Immediate
Moltke Plan + No Fleet Sortie- Maybe the delay can last till Jan-March 1915.
Rupprecht Plan - Immediate (Swiss were being invaded).
KronPrinz Plan- maybe by November- December 1914.
Shri wrote:@davesnoke and others
People quoting a 2-timing, narcotic smoking, half-drunk Churchill should see the actions of the English in last 500 years before commenting on others nationalities, i mean support for DURK and others who are being targeted here.
Let me quote the most English of all Fictions (Churchill was the greatest fiction writer in the 20th century, but unfortunately television did not exist then)
Sir Humphrey: Minister, Britain has had the same foreign policy objective for at least the last five hundred years: to create a disunited Europe. In that cause we have fought with the Dutch against the Spanish, with the Germans against the French, with the French and Italians against the Germans, and with the French against the Germans and Italians. Divide and rule, you see. Why should we change now, when it's worked so well?
England will and will and will enter any war whatsoever when the opponent is threatening the English Position.
If you have any more doubts please consult- Prof. Paul Kennedy's MAGNUM OPUS of Europe (500 years of history) or AJP Taylor or even Keegan (people quoting Keegan forget that Keegan always says the English will enter the war and also repeatedly berates the English and French for following duplicity, having colonies and then crying foul over German colonies, crying wolf over Belgian neutrality and then breaking Greek neutrality etc).
In realpolitik, there is no good or bad, Imperial Germany was perhaps the Best Government the Germans have had in 500 years since pre- 30 year war and British Propaganda made it look like Dr. Frankenstein Govt, the English were busy butchering Africa and Asia and building concentration camps worldwide in that time period.
But, whenever a NAVAL power has emerged England Fights - that is the only English Law which they adhere to.
Let me quote a really great English PM - Young Mr. Pitt (Stopped & reversed runaway Inflation - the true reason for the French and Russian Revolutions, Formed the basis for the absolute imposition of Gold Standard, Made Britain the universal Hegemon for a century, Abolished Slavery- died before the bill passed, Was the most Honest of men in an age of Dis Honesty et all, is mostly forgotten today as he did not write propaganda but instead did real work), when asked in Parliament what does England have to do with the nonsensical European War breaking out again (by the opposition, who as usual had no clue about guillotines and Napoleon); and further, he was asked to explain in a single sentence.
He replied- i will give the answer in one word- SECURITY.
So, England has to go to War, only when is the concern of the game.
I had written this 'approx. time value earlier', do so again-
Schlieffen- immediate.
Any plan + Fleet Sorties towards the Atlantic/North Sea- Immediate
Moltke Plan + No Fleet Sortie- Maybe the delay can last till Jan-March 1915.
Rupprecht Plan - Immediate (Swiss were being invaded).
KronPrinz Plan- maybe by November- December 1914.
HerrDan wrote:As it is I couldn't agree more with your commentary on the british stance towards Europe (and unfortunately even nowadays we can see that the british posture hasn't changed all that much...),
Shri wrote:@Merlin
Can you explain that angle a bit more?Interesting.
I like PITT mainly as he controlled inflation, increased monetary supply and kept the Gold Standard.
France lost its way in the late 1700's as it did not do these things properly. The whole John Law type episode or Robespierre or Lenin did not happen in England is i think due to Pitt's policies.
Shri wrote:SleepWalker is a good read. Agreed.
And yes, the UK will be in the War, only case is when?
Schlieffen- immediate.
Any plan + Fleet Sorties towards the Atlantic?- Immediate
Moltke Plan + No Fleet Sortie- Maybe the delay can last till Jan-March 1915.
Rupprecht Plan - Immediate (Swiss were being invaded).
KronPrinz Plan- maybe by November- December 1914.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests