User avatar
tripax
AGEod Veteran
Posts: 777
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:58 pm

Who are your favorite Union generals not in the game?

Thu Jul 30, 2015 6:21 pm

Here is a short list of generals who commanded divisions or higher commands who are not in the game (I have a longer list, but these are the names that stick out):
Charles Ferguson Smith, William W. Burns, Samuel D. Sturgis, Albin Francisco Schoepf, John J. Peck, Thomas A. Davies, Lysander Cutler, Alexander S. Webb, Marcellus M. Crocker, Nathan Kimball, James M. Tuttle, Thomas Welsh, John Milton Brannan, George Crook, James B. Steedman, Thomas W. Sherman, Charles Cruft, John F. Hartranft, Milo S. Hascall, Julius White, Joseph J. Bartlett, Thomas G. Stevenson, Gershom Mott, Orlando B. Wilcox, Julius Stahel, Joseph F. Knipe, John F. Miller, Isaac H. Duval, Joseph Thoburn, Frank Wheaton, Frederick C. Salomon, John Milton Thayer, Alfred N. Duffié, Thomas W. Egan, James H. Ledlie, Henry H. Lockwood, Henry Warner Birge, William Babcock Hazen, Nathaniel J. Jackson, James D. Morgan, Joseph A. Mower, Thomas H. Ruger, William Thomas Ward, Charles R. Woods, George L. Hartsuff, William Hays, Lewis A. Grant

Are you a fan of any of these or even one I’ve left out? Why? CF Smith is my favorite, because of his fame as Grant’s first great division commander, but I’m curious about others’ feelings.
Across the South, we have a deep appreciation of history -- we haven’t always had a deep appreciation of each other’s history. - Reverend Clementa Pinckney

User avatar
Durk
Posts: 2921
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:36 am
Location: Wyoming

Thu Jul 30, 2015 10:40 pm

It is an interesting list and question. I will just pick two, George Crook and Samuel D. Sturgis, though others have a similar reason for being noted. Many towns, counties and streets in the West are named after generals who were not particularly distinguished during the American Civil War but who made their reputation later in what were called 'The Indian Wars.' Some, like Crook had very distinguish post-war careers.

jasobass
Civilian
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Jul 18, 2015 1:49 am

Thu Jul 30, 2015 11:33 pm

I don't know if this counts or not but while mostly known as a Colonel wasn't Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain promoted to General by Grant after getting injured during the Siege of Petersburg?

User avatar
FightingBuckeye
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 280
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 7:27 am
Location: Englewood, CO

Thu Jul 30, 2015 11:46 pm

jasobass wrote:I don't know if this counts or not but while mostly known as a Colonel wasn't Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain promoted to General by Grant after getting injured during the Siege of Petersburg?


I've actually never made it far enough into the war to know whether he does/doesn't pop up as a General. In my mind he's definitely worthy of being in the game as a general, but if he was omitted it was likely because he only served in 1-2 battles as a general. Great selection though and I wholeheartedly agree.

Ranald S. MacKenzie is likely more well known in the Indian Wars. But he'd be my second solely because we're distantly related and share a last name.

ifailmore
Sergeant
Posts: 95
Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2015 4:38 am

Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:59 am

would be cool to roleplay chamberlain

User avatar
tripax
AGEod Veteran
Posts: 777
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:58 pm

Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:54 pm

I'd never hear of Mackenzie. I've always loved the song, Sergeant MacKenzie, about a WWI soldier, but which I always think fits well with the Civil War, too.
Across the South, we have a deep appreciation of history -- we haven’t always had a deep appreciation of each other’s history. - Reverend Clementa Pinckney

User avatar
FightingBuckeye
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 280
Joined: Fri Apr 17, 2015 7:27 am
Location: Englewood, CO

Fri Jul 31, 2015 7:34 pm

I've loved it since I heard it on 'We were Soldiers', and not just because of the name either. I'm pretty sure I included it in my Union AAR at some point.

When I was a kid I got one of those table top books with lots of pictures. You know, light reading material for an office or living room. This one was on the west as we were living in Ohio at the time and my parents were moving us to Texas. The book covered a broad range of famous people, events, and animals of the west; including Ranald "Bad Hand" MacKenzie. The name caught my eye and I decided to do some digging and lo and behold, distantly related.


https://army.togetherweserved.com/army/servlet/tws.webapp.WebApp?cmd=ShadowBoxProfile&type=Person&ID=253478

Fun fact, the 'S' in Ranald S. MacKenzie is Slidell. He was closely related to the very same Slidell of the Trent Affair fame. I want to say that Slidell was an uncle or cousin of Ranald.

User avatar
Durk
Posts: 2921
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:36 am
Location: Wyoming

Fri Jul 31, 2015 11:34 pm

Chamberlain would certainly count. He takes the final Confederate surrender at Appomattox as a general.

User avatar
Captain_Orso
Posts: 5766
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 5:02 pm
Location: Stuttgart, Germany

Sat Aug 01, 2015 2:19 pm

I think Alfred Howe Terry should have been included. I feel he's one of those generals who would have come out bigger, if given the opportunity. Spending much of the war in South Carolina and then under Butler in Bermuda Hundred didn't really give him the opportunity to shine in battle like many of his counterparts who fought in open battles under much different conditions.
Image

bobbitt01
Civilian
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu May 26, 2011 5:15 am

Mon Aug 03, 2015 7:07 am

I concur with Captain_Orso on Alfred H. Terry. He did successfully take Ft. Fisher on the second try with forces that Ben Butler was too incompetent to use correctly. But my favorite general not in the game has to be Charles Ferguson Smith because of his role as a former teacher for Grant, his willingness to serve under him, and the fact that he probably had the most combat experience out of any of Grant's divisional commanders. It makes it interesting what might have happened if he didn't die of an infection from a cut on the leg. (W.H.L. Wallace took over his division and was mortally wounded during the Battle of Shiloh.)

Rod Smart
Colonel
Posts: 332
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 3:32 pm

Mon Aug 03, 2015 3:24 pm

77 year old John E Wool.
Fought in the war of 1812, the Mexican American War, and various postings in the West. Had as much experience as Winfield Scott, but wasn't a fat old slob. He secured Fortress Monroe, captured Norfolk, led troops against the New York riots, and led the Department of the East from New York City until he was retired at the age of 79.

User avatar
tripax
AGEod Veteran
Posts: 777
Joined: Thu Aug 29, 2013 9:58 pm

Mon Aug 03, 2015 3:54 pm

Terry seems like a great general, I wonder why he isn't already included.

I like Wool a lot. A not completely unrelated figure is Ethan Allen Hitchcock. I don't think Hitchcock (a grandson of Ethan Allen) led a field army, but Halleck really wanted Hitchcock to replace or be promoted instead of Grant in the West.
Across the South, we have a deep appreciation of history -- we haven’t always had a deep appreciation of each other’s history. - Reverend Clementa Pinckney

Return to “Civil War II”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests