User avatar
gchristie
Brigadier General
Posts: 482
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 5:31 pm
Location: On the way to the forum

What's in a name?

Tue Aug 28, 2012 7:50 pm

Never took a Latin course in my life, so I'm freely showing my ignorance here. But curious, why this particular spelling for the name of the game? I've seen three different iterations of the Latin form of Caesar's quote (from my extensive research of, um, a very quick Google search). There are:

1. Alea iacta est
2. Alea Jacta Est (en: "The Dice Is Cast") is the third studio album by the Austrian power metal band WarCry, released on January 1, 2004
3. Iacta alea est


So, are the Phils major WarCry fans, or is there another reason they picked this particular spelling?
"Now, back to Rome for a quick wedding - and some slow executions!"- Miles Gloriosus

Metalist
Sergeant
Posts: 85
Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 2:23 pm

Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:13 pm

Maybe others didn't sound cool enough :bonk:

Wiki says "Alea iacte est": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alea_iacta_est

User avatar
yellow ribbon
Posts: 2245
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2011 5:42 pm

Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:39 pm

Metalist wrote:Maybe others didn't sound cool enough :bonk:

Wiki says "Alea iacte est": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alea_iacta_est



has been discussed since game was announced in public:

a.) there was the question whether french dont have the letter "I" [color="#FFFF00"]since Romans didnt even know "J"[/color]

b.) so you will find plenty of sources, greek original texts 50-100 years older than the questionable sources, which put even in doubt that he said it at all.

c.) you will find also historical evidence that it has nothing to do with casting dices, but rather a kind of "all consequences has been considered" since it was a reply, not just uttering...

fortunately no one of us was there, wiki is not the best source and "...Iacta est" is already a old game :wacko:
...not paid by AGEOD.
however, prone to throw them into disarray.

PS:

‘Everything is very simple in War, but the simplest thing is difficult. These difficulties accumulate and produce a friction which no man can imagine exactly who has not seen War . . . in War, through the influence of an infinity of petty circumstances, which cannot properly be described on paper, things disappoint us, and we fall short of the mark.‘

Clausewitz

Bertram
Posts: 454
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:22 pm

Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:41 pm

Latin didnt have the J in their script, they used the i for both the i and j sounds. So they would write iacta, but we would write jacta for the same prononciation. I guess using Jacta is easier on people unfamiliar with Latin.
Using all capitals as first characters in titels is something English/American. I think Romans would have used all capitals (for all characters) on inscritions and the like, or only capitals at the start of a sentence when writing something like a book.
(of course when they made longer inscriptions they used more abreviations then a 12 year old on twitter - you really need to know the customs to make sense of them).

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25662
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Wed Aug 29, 2012 7:57 am

when was invented the uppercase / lowercase differenciation?

I don't know the answer, but that must be one hell of difficult answer to find I believe... :)
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

User avatar
koningtiger
Lieutenant
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon May 14, 2012 11:49 am
Location: Hispania Citerior

Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:29 am

Some latin writings don´t have a point between sentences at all, some writers began to put a point over the firts word of a sentence to show that is a new sentence. Not sure if its about sentences or words, perhaps at that times all was written joint. :D

User avatar
Le Ricain
Posts: 3284
Joined: Sun Apr 09, 2006 12:21 am
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland

Wed Aug 29, 2012 11:58 am

it may be also worth pointing out that in Latin, there is no 'U' as the letter 'V' does double duty, eg IVLIVS (Julius).
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

'Nous voilà, Lafayette'

Colonel C.E. Stanton, aide to A.E.F. commander John 'Black Jack' Pershing, upon the landing of the first US troops in France 1917

User avatar
yellow ribbon
Posts: 2245
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2011 5:42 pm

Wed Aug 29, 2012 12:03 pm

Pocus wrote:when was invented the uppercase / lowercase differenciation?

I don't know the answer, but that must be one hell of difficult answer to find I believe... :)


not if you write all in bold letter like Romans or pictures like Egyptians :mdr:

i see, if there will be any expansion for much earlier times, you will do better and hand in a manual in babylonian cuneiform script
...not paid by AGEOD.

however, prone to throw them into disarray.



PS:



‘Everything is very simple in War, but the simplest thing is difficult. These difficulties accumulate and produce a friction which no man can imagine exactly who has not seen War . . . in War, through the influence of an infinity of petty circumstances, which cannot properly be described on paper, things disappoint us, and we fall short of the mark.‘



Clausewitz

User avatar
H Gilmer3
AGEod Grognard
Posts: 822
Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 2:57 am
Location: United States of America

Thu Aug 30, 2012 3:20 am

Bertram wrote:Latin didnt have the J in their script, they used the i for both the i and j sounds. So they would write iacta, but we would write jacta for the same prononciation. I guess using Jacta is easier on people unfamiliar with Latin.


I knew this! I learned it from Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade when he jumped on the "J" and almost fell through! He then says, "Idiot! In latin the first letter would be "I"!"

StephenT
Sergeant
Posts: 88
Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2010 3:14 pm

Thu Aug 30, 2012 8:30 pm

Pocus wrote:when was invented the uppercase / lowercase differenciation?
In Charlemagne's time, as part of the Carolingian Renaissance.

What we know today as 'lower case letters' were developed in late Roman times as a way of writing on paper using a pen, that was easier than the square 'Roman' capital letters designed to be carved into stone. But for a long time you either wrote in all-capitals, or in the new cursive scripts - and there were lots of different local variations of them, and so by the 8th century AD a monk in France couldn't read Latin text written in Germany, and a monk in Italy couldn't read Latin text written in France, because the scripts used were so different.

Charlemagne thought that was a bad idea, and ordered his ministers to invent a single, clear style of handwriting that would be used for all books, laws and charters throughout his empire. They decided to use cursive ("lower case") letters for the body of the text, but important words such as the first line of each chapter and the first word in each sentence would be distinguished by writing them in Roman ("upper case") letters instead. The rules of capitalisation wouldn't be standardised until many centuries later, but that's when the original idea of mixing the two letter styles deliberately for stylistic effect in the same piece of writing was developed.

Image

We can also thank Charlemagne for the practice of putting spaces between words, insteadofrunningallthewordstogetherwithnogaps.

User avatar
yellow ribbon
Posts: 2245
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2011 5:42 pm

Thu Aug 30, 2012 10:17 pm

StephenT wrote:In Charlemagne's time, as part of the Carolingian Renaissance.

What we know today as 'lower case letters' were developed in late Roman times as a way of writing on paper using a pen, that was easier than the square 'Roman' capital letters designed to be carved into stone. But for a long time you either wrote in all-capitals, or in the new cursive scripts - and there were lots of different local variations of them, and so by the 8th century AD a monk in France couldn't read Latin text written in Germany, and a monk in Italy couldn't read Latin text written in France, because the scripts used were so different.

Charlemagne thought that was a bad idea, and ordered his ministers to invent a single, clear style of handwriting that would be used for all books, laws and charters throughout his empire. They decided to use cursive ("lower case") letters for the body of the text, but important words such as the first line of each chapter and the first word in each sentence would be distinguished by writing them in Roman ("upper case") letters instead. The rules of capitalisation wouldn't be standardised until many centuries later, but that's when the original idea of mixing the two letter styles deliberately for stylistic effect in the same piece of writing was developed.

Image

We can also thank Charlemagne for the practice of putting spaces between words, insteadofrunningallthewordstogetherwithnogaps.


that cries out for the next AGEOD game theme... :mdr:
...not paid by AGEOD.

however, prone to throw them into disarray.



PS:



‘Everything is very simple in War, but the simplest thing is difficult. These difficulties accumulate and produce a friction which no man can imagine exactly who has not seen War . . . in War, through the influence of an infinity of petty circumstances, which cannot properly be described on paper, things disappoint us, and we fall short of the mark.‘



Clausewitz

Return to “Alea Jacta Est”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests