Erik Springelkamp wrote:I think active or offensive affects the probability, but I don't think they are strictly necessary.
Jagger2013 wrote:So basically, a corps with an inactive leader can still march to the guns but has less chance of marching to the guns than if the leader had been active. That makes sense.
Philo32b wrote:Being inactive is not one of the factors listed in the GameLogic.opt file. The GameLogic file has a great number of adjustable variables for many of the mechanics of the game. This file lists all the other factors that contribute to marching success, so I would take it as a reason to think that being inactive is not a factor.
Jagger2013 wrote:Actually I lean the other way. How often have we read of a commander doing absolutely nothing and the defensive position was compromised. Fairly common historically...
But many commanders are so often inactive that it would almost become the rule instead of the exception.
Anyway, the rule is as it is, and for now the evidence seems to be that being passive doesn't prevent reserve action.
Return to “Revolution Under Siege”
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests