This seems to be a rather nebulous currency. What does it exactly translate to, success? Game balancing device (like it was argued in ROP)?
If it would be success, now that would mean that any mobilizing policy, be it "partial mobilization", be it "building an armament factory" would be driven by success. A very Darwinistic approach. On the other hand history arguabably shows more examples of (total) mobilization not driven by success but rather by failure.