PhilThib wrote:The whole ANA army is created in Huliaipole on Nov 16, 1918 in the grand campaign scenario...
As I wrote in another thread:
"Makhno starts fighting in Jully 1918 with a detachment of cavalrymen.
September 1918 is the 'official' beginning of makhnovtchina when insurgent paesants, fighting succesfully against germans, adopt him as 'batko Makhno' leader, but it does not military expand before April 19 and then they are able (without Red help for months) to oppose the Whites."
Talking without having played:
So, what is this Nov 1918 ANA army in Huliaipole?
The small one at this time? able to defeat some demoralized germans about to retreat (but ANA army wasn't able at this time to oppose the Whites (the Whites of 1919..)),
Or directly the grown succesfull ANA army of Jully(?) 1919?
I think what could be missing in the AGE engine (or missing in what it has been used in RUS), is that makhnovists easily integered Red and Petliourist soldiers (often even whole regiments!) in their army.
The difference between neutrality and war times, was that
. in neutrality times, Red and Petlioura had to guard close their troops with loyal officers, to forbid them to join makhnovists
. in war times, at least 10% of the prisonners soldiers immediatly joined the blacks (other prisonners, if not officers who were very often shot, were freed).
Too (as the Greens), paesants joined the Black when they felt threated. So, Black need some same model as the Green.
The reverse is true: When they felt in peace, paesants came back from army to home (if they still had one..) the same way as they went in the black army.