AGEOD Forums

Not sure if this has been brought up before, apologies if I'm repeating someone else.
Playing as French, F&IW, 1.04c plus community mod.
Have had the Flotille de L'Isle Royale sat in Louisbourg harbour in passive posture for nearly a year. It's strength has been 149/200 for all that time, it hasn't received any replacements. My total supply usage for all units in Cap Breton is 69 a go and Louisbourg has a supply level of 32, thats about 150 supply a turn, so there has been enough supply and I haven't been besieged or blockaded at all.
Why hasn't the fleet's strength gone up?
The manual doesn't say anything about level of harbour required to receive replacements, just says a harbour, although the one in question is only level 1 so rate of repair will be slower than better harbours.
Saves and logs attached

deleted

Gray_Lensman wrote:What do the elements look like in the Unit Detail Box? Assuming the game is similar to AACW in this part of the interface, if the elements are all green, then it has completed repairs as far as it can possibly go. Some of the units in the various AGEod games scenario setups are pre-designated to start with less than their full compliment of "elements" giving you a strength report that is fractional similar to what you state above. In your case, it appears that you are trying to repair one of these ships units that probably only started with 3 elements out of 4.

Hope this helps.

Not really

The strength is shown as 149 men of 200 max. After moving the fleet to Quebec, level 5 harbour I think, took one or two turns to get up to full strength of 200. I think it must be to do with the level 1 harbour at Louisbourg not repairing at all.

deleted

For naval repairs the port level must be 2 or hight

LUDOPEREZ wrote:For naval repairs the port level must be 2 or hight

Looks like that is indeed the case, it just doesn't tell us that in the manual.
It just says any harbour to recover strength at the the rate of 5% per level of harbour. Shouldn't the manual reflect this if it is the case?

You are right...an oversight (among others ). Thanks