User avatar
Hobbes
Posts: 4438
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:18 am
Location: UK

Representing Supply

Sat Mar 28, 2009 11:18 am

Hi folks, I want to represent a small amount of fast moving supply, not bulky supply wagons. Are the only important factors here the IsSupport, Supply and Ammo Store and the ShareSupply parameters?

If I change the SubType from $SupplyType to $Irregular and the family from $famSupply to $famRaider can I expect the unit to still act as a supply source with no ill effects?

Thanks, Chris

User avatar
lodilefty
Posts: 7616
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 3:27 pm
Location: Finger Lakes, NY GMT -5 US Eastern

Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:29 pm

I think you have parameters OK

Why not just change the move type to $Ranger, and increase the Move Ratio?

I'd leave family/subtype alone. Those get into replacements, etc. and could cause problems...
Always ask yourself: "Am I part of the Solution?" If you aren't, then you are part of the Problem!
[CENTER][/CENTER]
[CENTER]Visit AGEWiki - your increasingly comprehensive source for information about AGE games[/CENTER]

[CENTER]Rules for new members[/CENTER]
[CENTER]Forum Rules[/CENTER]

[CENTER]Help desk: support@slitherine.co.uk[/CENTER]

User avatar
Hobbes
Posts: 4438
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:18 am
Location: UK

Sat Mar 28, 2009 1:54 pm

lodilefty wrote:I think you have parameters OK

Why not just change the move type to $Ranger, and increase the Move Ratio?

I'd leave family/subtype alone. Those get into replacements, etc. and could cause problems...


Well Pontiac's War has no replacements at least. The move type is $Ranger. The only reason I ask is that Indian Trader Supply in a stack prevents the Indians taking an ambush posture when the supply really just represents the Indians having a few more provisions and ammo.

I'll give it a go and see if there are any problems.
Cheers, Chris

User avatar
lodilefty
Posts: 7616
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 3:27 pm
Location: Finger Lakes, NY GMT -5 US Eastern

Sat Mar 28, 2009 2:03 pm

:D

I look forward to hearing how it works!

'twould be yet another excellent capability for future mods/scenarios :thumbsup:
Always ask yourself: "Am I part of the Solution?" If you aren't, then you are part of the Problem!
[CENTER][/CENTER]

[CENTER]Visit AGEWiki - your increasingly comprehensive source for information about AGE games[/CENTER]



[CENTER]Rules for new members[/CENTER]

[CENTER]Forum Rules[/CENTER]



[CENTER]Help desk: support@slitherine.co.uk[/CENTER]

User avatar
Pocus
Posts: 25673
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 7:37 am
Location: Lyon (France)

Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:31 pm

As you are in simple supply, then for most effects I think it is ok to have a supply unit which is not of family $famSupply. For advanced supply games, you could not do that though.
Image


Hofstadter's Law: "It always takes longer than you expect, even when you take into account Hofstadter's law."

User avatar
Hobbes
Posts: 4438
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 12:18 am
Location: UK

Sat Mar 28, 2009 5:53 pm

Pocus wrote:As you are in simple supply, then for most effects I think it is ok to have a supply unit which is not of family $famSupply. For advanced supply games, you could not do that though.


Thanks Philippe!

Return to “Modding AGE engine games”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests