User avatar
paw1776
Captain
Posts: 192
Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 5:29 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Contact: Website

Error on all battle screens - English Ver.

Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:09 am

The correct spelling is cannon, cannons

So 10 Cannons is correct, not canons. English spelling is with 2 n's.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannon

This shows incorrect on how many troops participated and how many killed.

Maybe looks good for the French version ;) But not english.

Unless you are talking about the printer company Canon :blink:

User avatar
Gray_Lensman
Posts: 497
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:04 am
Location: Who is John Galt?

Fri Apr 10, 2009 9:30 am

deleted

User avatar
Jim-NC
Posts: 2981
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 4:21 pm
Location: Near Region 209, North Carolina

General's Stats

Fri Apr 10, 2009 6:49 pm

I have another issue with the after battle reports. I am using 1.13b. Is there a way to get the reports to show the updated Strat/Att/Def values for generals? For example, any Corps commander attached to Lee's or Grant's Army has a large bonus to all 3 values in the regular view screen. However, when viewed in the after battle screen, their vanilla numbers show up. It's not really a bug, but it is annoying to me to see different stats show up under the officer in question. I believe it is related to where they info is pulled when the report is produced.
Remember - The beatings will continue until morale improves.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

User avatar
Spharv2
Posts: 1540
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 5:39 am
Location: Tallahassee, FL

Fri Apr 10, 2009 7:28 pm

Jim-NC wrote:I have another issue with the after battle reports. I am using 1.13b. Is there a way to get the reports to show the updated Strat/Att/Def values for generals? For example, any Corps commander attached to Lee's or Grant's Army has a large bonus to all 3 values in the regular view screen. However, when viewed in the after battle screen, their vanilla numbers show up. It's not really a bug, but it is annoying to me to see different stats show up under the officer in question. I believe it is related to where they info is pulled when the report is produced.


I believe I brought this up back in beta, same applies to random general usage, you only are shown the vanilla numbers. If I recall correctly, this is not changable...buried too deep or somesuch, can't recall exactly, just that they couldn't make the change. Of course, things may have changed...can only hope. :)
Official Queen's Ambassador to the South
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Return to “Help to improve AACW!”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests