Search found 140 matches

Go to advanced search

by Stelteck
Sun Feb 28, 2016 12:01 pm
Forum: To End All Wars
Topic: Controlling provinces: rebel alignement and speedy military control
Replies: 1
Views: 582

1- You can use strategic decision on the diplomacy titles to give concessions to people and things like that. But Listening to public is for the weak there are others penalty. 2- Your troops gain military control while presents and uncontested. Being in offensive mode give more military control than...
by Stelteck
Sat Feb 27, 2016 10:57 pm
Forum: To End All Wars
Topic: How to Assign Armies to Army Groups
Replies: 2
Views: 1142

If you select your GHQ (OHL) and hit the shift key, you will see the command range of the GHQ. To attach VI and VII and VIII on russian front to OHL, you need to move these armies (or at least their commanding officier) very close to the GHQ. Currently they are too far. Sometimes it is also easier t...
by Stelteck
Fri Feb 26, 2016 10:42 am
Forum: To End All Wars
Topic: Newb question supporting units Corps
Replies: 1
Views: 760

There is no avantage. Put in the integrated corps the units that take the most command points.
by Stelteck
Wed Feb 24, 2016 3:57 pm
Forum: To End All Wars
Topic: List of minor issues (bug, not balance) of current PBEM :
Replies: 19
Views: 3392

That's intentional. The U-Boat campaign didn't ramp up until later in the war largely due to Germany not having subs capable of staying deep at sea until 1916-1917. Thanks a lot for all your advices. Another question related to commerce raid : - If i use cruiser in the atlantic trade box, did this ...
by Stelteck
Wed Feb 24, 2016 9:24 am
Forum: To End All Wars
Topic: List of minor issues (bug, not balance) of current PBEM :
Replies: 19
Views: 3392

Regarding subs, I reviewed the events, at Lvl 2 you only get an increased pool to build. They don't upgrade to next level of subs until lvl 3. But you should see quite a few more in your build pool. Regarding air units, unfortunately it's a bit of a mystery to me how they work as well. OK thanks i ...
by Stelteck
Tue Feb 23, 2016 8:00 pm
Forum: To End All Wars
Topic: List of minor issues (bug, not balance) of current PBEM :
Replies: 19
Views: 3392

Mars 1915 : Submarines are not upgraded to level 2 yet, even if i have tech 2 + 10% :confused: I got the lusitana event, but not sûre if i had submarines in atlantic blockage. Strange. Another remark : I do not understand anything at the battle screen for air battle : Help me for the love of all wha...
by Stelteck
Tue Feb 23, 2016 3:36 pm
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Recommended Vietnam era or WWII [European Theater or Africa/Italy] Games
Replies: 4
Views: 1891

I confirm Vietnam 65 is a very interesting little game with more deep mecanism than it looks at first.
by Stelteck
Sun Feb 21, 2016 11:42 pm
Forum: To End All Wars
Topic: List of minor issues (bug, not balance) of current PBEM :
Replies: 19
Views: 3392

It is funny a lots of events are really unpredictable. I'am in march 1915. This turn, Airplane upgrade. But still not submarines. (But submarines tech level is 2 + 00%, but Airplaine is 2 + 10%). Maybe there is a issue with > and >= in decision ? This turn, turkey is 100% Central, but did not join m...
by Stelteck
Sun Feb 21, 2016 7:27 pm
Forum: To End All Wars
Topic: Loss of Army Titles & Other Thoughts
Replies: 3
Views: 1137

Carefull when proposing more defensive bonus, because it is a game and players have more insight than WW1 Generals. If offensive is impossible, unlike WW1 generals, players will not attack. In this case, it will lead to very boring western front. (And the russian will have to face all german armies ...
by Stelteck
Thu Feb 18, 2016 11:48 pm
Forum: To End All Wars
Topic: List of minor issues (bug, not balance) of current PBEM :
Replies: 19
Views: 3392

Just a question : I'am now submarine level II as central power, but i still cannot built anything else than coastal submarines (the one with 40% speed and bad range). I was not supposed to get / be able to construct a new model (like the one with 70% speed i have from the start in a small, unique un...
by Stelteck
Thu Feb 18, 2016 8:57 pm
Forum: To End All Wars
Topic: List of minor issues (bug, not balance) of current PBEM :
Replies: 19
Views: 3392

Concession to Italy appeared on turn 2 of 1915 (unknown reason). So everything ok with it.
by Stelteck
Tue Feb 16, 2016 9:43 pm
Forum: To End All Wars
Topic: List of minor issues (bug, not balance) of current PBEM :
Replies: 19
Views: 3392

This is the save of the first turn of 1915 :
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/64073834/EndOfAllWar/No%20Italie%20Decision.zip

I will post the next one when it is available.
by Stelteck
Tue Feb 16, 2016 10:28 am
Forum: To End All Wars
Topic: List of minor issues (bug, not balance) of current PBEM :
Replies: 19
Views: 3392

I'am the first turn of 1915. The logs say i have 3 new decisions : - ONe remarquable officier to give ARty research boost. - Concession to bulgaria. (OK). - Concession to Italia. (NOK). But the concession to Italia is not available and still unlocked, even if Italia is still neutral. I will check th...
by Stelteck
Sun Feb 14, 2016 3:31 pm
Forum: To End All Wars
Topic: List of minor issues (bug, not balance) of current PBEM :
Replies: 19
Views: 3392

Thanks for the tips relative to fortress bombardement of navy. I have a new clue about the "Bombard Fortification" decision that do not work. I though it was consumming amunition, but reading another time the decision, it may consume ammunition train. 4 amunition trains. So the cost of the decision ...
by Stelteck
Sat Feb 13, 2016 4:01 pm
Forum: To End All Wars
Topic: List of minor issues (bug, not balance) of current PBEM :
Replies: 19
Views: 3392

The "naval mine" event have some minor display issue (and my game is in english !!!!) :

Image
by Stelteck
Sat Feb 13, 2016 3:39 pm
Forum: To End All Wars
Topic: List of minor issues (bug, not balance) of current PBEM :
Replies: 19
Views: 3392

List of minor issues (bug, not balance) of current PBEM :

Hi. I'am playing a PBEM currently. I'am end 1914 the game is quite fun. But i found the following stranges thing so far (minor) : - Since august, each turn i play the decision to bombard Antwerp (artillery bombardment). I have 2 railroad artillery, and last time 3 additionnal heavy artillery. Each t...
by Stelteck
Fri Feb 12, 2016 11:16 am
Forum: To End All Wars
Topic: Small question about display of combat power on map
Replies: 1
Views: 519

Small question about display of combat power on map

Hi. I'am currently playing a multiplayer game and doing an AAR (in french). http://forum.canardpc.com/threads/103880-AAR-Ageod-End-of-All-War-Le-Kaiser-dansera-au-moulin-rouge-No-Espions-Anglais I have a small issue with display of combat power on map. The number displayed for the ennemy is the sum ...
by Stelteck
Mon Sep 07, 2015 1:09 pm
Forum: Thirty Years War
Topic: Initial Impressions?
Replies: 51
Views: 13982

Someone from the canard PC french forum bought the game and played a full campaign one evening. The reviewer is well aware of Ageod game and love especially civil war 2. The review was not very positive. May i share with you a resume of the report it could be interesting : The reviewer complained of...
by Stelteck
Mon Aug 24, 2015 8:19 pm
Forum: ROP Technical support / Aide technique
Topic: Bug renfort britaniques / Bug british Reinforcement
Replies: 6
Views: 2816

Non rien fait.
by Stelteck
Sat Aug 22, 2015 8:48 am
Forum: ROP Technical support / Aide technique
Topic: Bug renfort britaniques / Bug british Reinforcement
Replies: 6
Views: 2816

Il y a le même soucis avec les renforts suédois qui sont à 30 points d'engagement. Avec tous les bugs répertoriés (dont les problèmes critiques de campagne comme les russes bloqués) ), ROP mériterait bien un patch 1.2. Et qui soit poussé sous steam...... Je ne comprends vraiment pas pourquoi rien n'...
by Stelteck
Wed Aug 12, 2015 9:44 am
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Rule the Waves: a fine game !
Replies: 2
Views: 2040

I bought it. The interface look like the one of the Aurora 4X and the battle engine is really hard core for the eyes.

But it is actually quite fun and interesting.

I love it.
by Stelteck
Mon Aug 10, 2015 3:43 pm
Forum: PBEM and multiplayer matchups (all games)
Topic: Rise of Prussia 4 player campaign
Replies: 2
Views: 801

I'am currently playing one. But it is only turn 9.

Quite interesting so far. I'am playing French AND russian.

French and Russian sides have less thing to do than austrian or of course Prussia, so it could be interesting to merge them.
by Stelteck
Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:29 pm
Forum: General discussions
Topic: Your wishlist!
Replies: 43
Views: 9722

1- Increase stability of the engine and turn execution performance. It is really important. I sometimes search for Ageod in more general forums such as reddit. The compagny games seems to have a bad reputation (coming mostly from the past) in the casual community of being with lots of bugs, crashing...
by Stelteck
Tue Aug 04, 2015 12:53 pm
Forum: Rise of Prussia
Topic: Steam version vs. non-Steam version
Replies: 4
Views: 2559

We really need path 1.11 on Steam.
by Stelteck
Tue Feb 17, 2015 11:30 am
Forum: General discussions
Topic: The French Surrender in 1940
Replies: 15
Views: 5004

My own grand father was in a cavalry regiment raised from camargues, near Nimes, in the south of France, a region with a big horse tradition. He was in Belgium, fight a little, then retreated to dunkirk, thanks to horses behind very efficient at retreating offroad :) (The infantery part of its units...
by Stelteck
Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:43 pm
Forum: General discussions
Topic: The French Surrender in 1940
Replies: 15
Views: 5004

Keeping France in fight in 1940 would have been very difficult MainLand was lost. Some delaying action could have been done to allow to evacuate what could be, but all industries, shipyard, etc.. were in mainland France. For example keeping the powerfull french fleet battle ready would have been a l...
by Stelteck
Fri Sep 26, 2014 9:09 am
Forum: Revolution Under Siege
Topic: Division size
Replies: 7
Views: 2661

Thanks you, i did not realized before that frontage was only "whose who shoot". I thought it was "whose who fight".
by Stelteck
Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:20 am
Forum: Revolution Under Siege
Topic: Division size
Replies: 7
Views: 2661

Relative to tachanka (or mountain troops), i thought having a single independant unit in the corps pile was enough to give the initiative bonus to the whole pile ? I also do not understand why having a big division help avoiding destruction of elements ? Does divisions give bonus for frontage calcul...
by Stelteck
Wed Sep 24, 2014 5:27 pm
Forum: Revolution Under Siege
Topic: Division size
Replies: 7
Views: 2661

Thanks for the information.

I was doing exactly the opposite. (Using small unit in division and large unit in free slot).
by Stelteck
Wed Sep 24, 2014 12:30 pm
Forum: Revolution Under Siege
Topic: Division size
Replies: 7
Views: 2661

Division size

Hi. One small request for information. In my siberian white game, i have a strange behaviour about division size. Some leader can built division size 9/10 elements maximum. But with some others leaders, i can put far more elements (15/20 maybe more) inside a single division. I did not understood why...

Go to advanced search