Paradox isn't clueless, but the idiots running the business are. OK, they're making substantial short term profits, despite their last two games being pants, due to a large forgiving fan base. They probably spent several brainstorming sessions coming up with Pride. Imagine if instead of hiring busin...
Vainglory is such a wonderfully redolent 19th Century world. It's also a word that grabs the eye. Pride is such a prosaic, blandly positive word. Ageod sold their soul to paradix. Now they can't even name their own games! LMFAO Paradix! :mdr: Clearly the marketing/PR department at Paradox don't know...
I see different versions of the game name, some with Vainglory as one word, like the title of this subforum, and some with two words, like the title in the recent screen shots.
Given that vainglory is a more precise term than vain glory, I assume that vainglory is correct.
And i don't understand why people are arguing about this issue. Is so difficult to play with a map rotated in a different way as we're accostumed to see in other PC games? No it's not difficult. But we shouldn't have to. The map is plug ugly as it is, having a non-standard map orientation for no ap...
I don't really understand why the map has to be at the crazy orientation that it is. All other grand strategy games have North at the top, including all AGEOD games and Great Invasions. Also I don't understand why it is such a great deal of effort to change the orientation, surely you just load it i...
In Tutorial 2, the battle screen is partially obscured by the tutorial window, thus making it impossible to place the corps where the tutorial instructs.
The map orientation is crazy. :bonk: Having North to the left may make sense in purely technical terms, but is an esthetic abomination. Every other game I can think of has North at the top. Including Great Invasions, All AGEOD titles and all Paradox titles. The feat of pixel perfect dexterity requir...
If the two detachments are inside the same area, you can drag & drop one detachment over the second one. I mean the soldier representation on the map, of course. When doing so, a popup menu will appear, asking you which is the detachment you want to merge with. That's not working for me. I have yet...
I have a a couple of questions: 1. How is trench warfare handled? Except in early 1914 and 1918, gains were measured in a few kilometers, not an entire province. 2. Is there any compulsion to conduct futile (in terms of strategic gain) trench warfare? If not won't the game stagnate into a sitzkrieg?
thanks philippe am i the only one who is suffering from this problem, or is it common to all PCs with decent specs? yeah i have AACW, but i was rather too much for me, so since BoA was reasonably priced, i thought i would give it a shot edit: i have used the option to slow it down as much as i can
just bought the game this afternoon, worked my way through the tutorial, MUCH simpler that ACW (phew!), and played the scenario reconmended by the tutorial: carolinas 1776 lulled into a false sense of security by the tutorial, i used brown's force to try to take camden and landed all of my reinforce...