AGEOD Forums

Gresbeck

JMass wrote:Uh, oh! I wait for a Pax Romana 2 turn-based...

Agreed. And AGE engine is already there

Gresbeck

Through emancipation (playing as the Union) I should get 150 VP, 5 NM, and I should lower chance of foreign intervention. Why should I decide not to emancipate?

Gresbeck

It's in the works, but hasn't been done yet (i.e. not in any patch made pucblic yet). I.e. keep churning out those division HQ units if you want to form divisions. :confused: I'm a little bit worried about it. Will such a "revolutionary" new game design be compatible with previous save games? What ...

Gresbeck

A single unit is enough :) Blockade numbers are for brown-water blockade of production/income (or suchlike); not sure what the blockade number means for rivers, but for blocking supply and land unit movement, a single unit is sufficient. Interesting. So can anybody explain what the blockade number ...

Gresbeck

you need to have them at least to 50%, to prevent some exploits. The manual try to give the essential, and not all anti exploits and tiny rules, this would drown you otherwise :) Isn't it in any case an exploit to use (partially) depleted or cheaper units to build forts? Do the forts strength depen...

Gresbeck

Thanks Pocus.

Gresbeck

If you are not satisfied with the supply distribution, you have a manual tool in your hand: supply wagons. They will only give back their supply to units, so you can stockpile manually with them. That's a point I'm not sure I get. Since BoA, I thought supply wagons distribute their supply to units ...

Gresbeck

goodwood wrote:Bullrun Scenario Victory score 110 to -28 my morale at end game 153

Shiloh scenario Victory score 91 to 55 My morale 150 victory sceen doesn't show opponents morale

But did you achieve only a score victory or did you conquer the strategic objectives?

Gresbeck

Thanks, I didn't think about it.

Gresbeck

I've just begun a campaign as the Union, but I cannot merge more than 7-8 elements (when I select more units, the merge button seems not to be selectable any more). Am I missing something or in the early stages of the war division containers are less capable?

Gresbeck

O.K. thanks. Let me insist on the idea to make brigades detachable from divisions through drag and drop. One of the nicest features of ageod's design is the easy management of the units; splitting and reforming divisions is sometimes quite annoying.

Gresbeck

I played (almost) every small scenarios on both sides, and neither achieved a victory nor lost: always stalemates. Sometimes I played very poorly (especially as the CSA) and was constantly defeated in the single battles, but nevertheless the scenario ended with a stalemate. Playing the Gettysburg sc...

Gresbeck

Just begun to play the game (only small scenarios), I read the manual and played the tutorials, and have a few (probably stupid) questions. 1) The manual says you can detach a brigade from a division. As far as I see, the only way to reorganize divisions is to disband and reform them; i.e. you can't...

Gresbeck

[quote="Pocus"]and the posture of the defending unit is in defensive/passive? Then you got a bug and I want the save ]

You mean units in forts set in offensive posture will sortie even if you don't press the sortie button? Never heard about it.

Gresbeck

Will it work with previous saved files?

Gresbeck

Robin wrote:L'élégance notamment du design n'est même pas citée...
Bouh... leure:

(Viva italia !)

VIVA!

[ATTACH]139[/ATTACH]

Gresbeck

As for the passive posture and being in a structure, I think its more a loophole than anything else. I too agree that in this case no penalties should be given... But lets not be hasty, I will wait for PhilThib and the betas to check if nothing bad would stem from the fix. Is it the same in 1.08? T...

Gresbeck

It's probably a "victory" but you had no combat units left and the enemy had 1. The battle is still won, but your supply units evapourate. Check the battle report, if your losses equal your starting combat units, then you're supplies/cannon will be lost. I suspect something like that happened to me...

Gresbeck

I mean, I know leaders reappear in friendly towns, but that seems rather strange for Indian leaders. It also seems that Indian leaders can command national units. Is it historical?

Gresbeck

Yeah, I'm a little uneasy with the way that Entrenchments are done. If you are in a Fort, why bulid Entrenchments that are less effective than the Fort defenses. If you want to construct Entrenchments and not get bottled up in the Fort, you should have to leave the Fort defenses and construct Entre...

Gresbeck

Also, I'm not clear on entering a city whether it's undefended or I captured it. Why must I take one more turn to click the button confirming that I want to enter the city. It seems that moving your unit to the city should automatically enter the city if no one is there or you've captured it. If th...

Gresbeck

O.K, I got it (ctrl + save button). Stupid question, I admit. I never thought hovering with the mouse on the save button. But I didn't find this feature documented and forums exist also for stupid questions.

Gresbeck

What a region gives to units is not relevant here. The supply given by a region will resplenish partially of fully the units there, including the supplies trains (so that they can shield you from bad weather for the next turn, etc.). 1. So if I have two adjacent regions, each with a supply value of...

Gresbeck

Does attrition depend on the size of the army located in a region? I mean, is the supply value of a region divided between the units located in the same region?

Gresbeck

killed by weather leaders should be able to benefit from the special redeployment rule (reappearing in a friendly city). Is this not the case? Probably I'm missing the point. Are we talking aboout leader disappearing in friendly territory or in enemy territory? I insist leaders should suffer attrit...

Gresbeck

Should that be? He was moving all by himself to join some troops and died of pneumonia? IMO leaders shouldn't attrition away. I disagree. First of all we should think that leader icons don't represent individual men, but small units: the leader and his personal guards and attendants. These units ar...

Gresbeck

I wouldn't mind having automatic or "carry-over" postures for Ambush and Entrench. But the point is that if entrenching units get no penalty, it doesn't make sense to have them not entrenched: and I don't see any reason to give manually such an order. As for entrenchments maybe it could be a two-le...

Gresbeck

1. So an offensive posture isn't needed to block an enemy port, right? 2. Regarding naval blockades, I suppose transports cannot block enemy ports, right? 3. Are transports considered by the game engine to determine the supply value of regions with ports? If so, should the player move the transports...

Gresbeck

Is it provocative to think the game engine could work for the Vietnam War (both French and US)? Totally different period, but guerilla war, low troop density, commitment/withdrawl of forces, political events, cooperating (and not) allies, supply shortages and there is no game I'm aware of which deal...

Gresbeck

Probably I'm completely stupid, but I can't get how it works

leure:.
Whenever I save, I always see a predefined filename and I don't understand how I can change it. I've read that the "save as" command has been implemented since older patches (playing actually 1.05). Could please someone help?

Search found 66 matches

Is there any reason not to emancipate?

18 elements in a division?

Are smaller scenarios winnable?

Corps and division management

Indian leaders reappearing in towns

Entrenchmentes, cities and forts

Save as